Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

86P - KRAS G12 versus G13 codon mutation survival rates for different lines of MCRC treatment: Real-world data over a 4 year period

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Saw San Ti

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S1-S74. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1477

Authors

S. San Ti

Author affiliations

  • King's College London Guy's Hospital - NHS Foundation Trust, London/GB

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 86P

Background

KRAS is an oncogene associated with poor prognosis in colorectal cancers. Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TT) is often used in the 3rd-line setting for pts with MCRC irrespective of KRAS mutation status. Since 2022, three retrospective publications have shown differing results in terms of outcome to TT based on KRAS status. One showed pts with a G12 mutation did not have a survival advantage with TT compared to placebo whereas those with a G13 mutation did (Van der Haar 2023). However, two other publications showed a survival benefit, with TT based therapy regardless of KRAS codon 12 or 13 mutation status (Yoshino 2022, Tabenero ESMOabs 2023).

Methods

We retrospectively analysed survival data for different lines of chemotherapy for pts with KRAS G12 and G13 mutations over 4 years (2018-2021). Prism was used to analyse data using both Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxson test and Logrank test.

Results

306 patients were evaluated, of which 80% (n= 246) were KRAS G12 mutated. The OS for the whole group was 25 mths with no significant difference between G12 and G13 patients (760/757 days, p = 0.99). OS for first-line treatment (277 pts) was 19.2 mths and 18 mths (p = 0.43). 1st-line Oxaliplatin based chemotherapy (148 pts) was 19 v 23.4 mths (p = 0.94). 56% (174 pts) who received second line treatment had an OS of 12.5 and 13 mths (P = 0.77). 2nd-line Irinotecan (90 pts) was 11.8 v 13.5 mths (p = 0.79). The OS for the 21% (n= 66) (G13: 13 pts) who received TT as third line was 6.9 v 8.2 mths (p = 0.42). OS for G12D (42%) v G12C (8%) v other G12 mutations (50%) was 23.3 v 32.8 v 25.5 mths (p=0.39).

Conclusions

Based on more than 300 pts collected from a 4-year period, neither G12 or G13 KRAS mutations influenced the survival for pts receiving 1st, 2nd or 3rd line therapies. However, these results have to be considered with some caution due to the rarity of the G13 mutation (20% of cohort – 60 pts).

Legal entity responsible for the study

The author.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

The author has declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.