Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

298P - Gemcitabine-based therapy versus non-gemcitabine-based therapy as neoadjuvant for liver transplant recipients with cholangiocarcinoma: An institution experience

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Abdullah Esmail

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S119-S161. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1481

Authors

A. Esmail1, M. Abdelrahim2, J. Xu1, R.M. Ghobrial3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Houston Methodist Neal Cancer Center, Houston/US
  • 2 Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston/US
  • 3 Houston Methodist, Houston/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 298P

Background

The management of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is constantly updated given existing evidence in order to establish practice guidelines. Here, we evaluate the outcomes of gemcitabine-based therapy versus non-gemcitabine-based therapy as neo-adjuvant for orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients with cholangiocarcinoma.

Methods

In this retrospective study, CCA cases that underwent OLT at our center between January 2008 and March 2023 were identified. This cohort is stratified by systemic neoadjuvant therapy into two major cohorts Gemcitabine-Based Group (GBG) Vs. Non- Gemcitabine-Based Group (NGBG). Data are presented as mean±SD or median (IQR) for continuous measures, and n (%) for categorical measures. The primary endpoints were the overall survival post-OLT. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to estimate the survival at different time points in the two groups, respectively.

Results

During this cohort, 76 patients with CCA underwent OLT. Of these, 27 patients either did not receive neoadjuvant therapy or diagnosed mixed with HCC were excluded. A total of 49 patients with CCA were analyzed (EHCCA 25 Vs. IHCCA 24), the majority were male (n=28) with a mean age of 54.79± 12.86 years at OLT. The GBG was 41 pts (23 with locoregional therapy/liver-directed therapy (LRT/LDT), 18 without LRT/LDT), and NGBG was 8 Pts (8 with LRT/LDT, 0 without LRT/LDT). The best response achieved to systemic therapy was complete response (CR) 11(22.45), partial response (PR) 22 (44.90), stable disease (SD)13 (26.53) and progression disease (PD) 3 (6.12). The median post-OLT follow-up was 4.05 years (IQR: 2.42-6.16 years). The systemic therapy discontinuation reasons were completion 29 (59.18), surgery 12 (24.49), and toxicity 8 (16.33). Overall survival (OS) at 1 year: 100% in the GBG, 87.5% (95% CI: 38.7%-98.1%) in NGBG. OS at 2 years: 97.4% (95% CI: 83.2%-99.6%) in the GBG, 62.5% (95% CI: 22.9%-86.1%) in the NGBG. OS at 3 years: 81.0% (95% CI: 64.2%-90.4%) in the GBG, 62.5% (95% CI: 22.9%-86.1%) in the NGBG.

Conclusions

Based on the previously described data, the GBG demonstrated improvement in outcomes compared to the NGBG in pts with CCA prior to OLT.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.