Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

416P - Evolutionary and immune microenvironment dynamics determine response to neoadjuvant treatment of oesophageal adenocarcinoma

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Melissa Barroux

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S162-S204. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1482

Authors

M. Barroux1, J. Househam2, E. Lakatos3, T. Ronel4, A. Baker4, H. Salié5, M. Mossner6, M. Jansen7, G. Caravagna8, K. Steiger9, J. Slotta-Huspenina10, W. Weichert11, M. Alberstmeier12, B. Chain13, H. Friess14, B. Bengsch5, R. Schmid15, J.T. Siveke16, M. Quante5, T. Graham6

Author affiliations

  • 1 TUM - Technical University of Munich, Munich/DE
  • 2 ICR - Institute of Cancer Research, London/GB
  • 3 Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg/SE
  • 4 ICR - Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton/GB
  • 5 Universitätsklinikum Freiburg - Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Freiburg im Breisgau/DE
  • 6 The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton/GB
  • 7 UCL Cancer Institute - Paul O'Gorman Building, London/GB
  • 8 University of Triest, Triest/IT
  • 9 TUM - Technical University of Munich, 81675 - Munich/DE
  • 10 TUM - Technische Universitaet München, Munich/DE
  • 11 Technische Universität München-Institute of Pathology, Munich/DE
  • 12 University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich/DE
  • 13 UCL - University College London, London/GB
  • 14 Klinikum Rechts der Isar - Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Munich/DE
  • 15 School of Medicine and Health, Technische Universität München, Munich/DE
  • 16 Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen/DE

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 416P

Background

Locally advanced oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) remains difficult to treat because of common resistance to neoadjuvant therapy and frequent recurrence.

Methods

We performed a multi-omic study with a multi-timepoint strategy to investigate neoadjuvant treatment response at clonal resolution and in the tumor microenvironment. EAC samples from chemotherapy responding (REPs) and chemotherapy non-responding (NRPs) patients were collected at three time points (before, during, and after neoadjuvant therapy) within the DKTK-funded MEMORI trial[1]. Deep whole exome sequencing was performed on 48 samples from 17 REPs and on 22 samples from 10 NRPs. Matched RNA sequencing was performed on 54 samples from 17 REPs and on 26 samples from 10 NRPs. Longitudinal imaging mass cytometry (IMC) to characterize immune response was performed on 27 REP-samples and 16 NRP-samples and T-cell receptor sequencing in 18 REP-samples and 9 NRP-samples.

Results

EAC showed major transcriptomic changes during treatment with upregulation of immune, stromal and oncogenic pathways such as EMT, KRAS, Hedgehog and WNT. However, phylogenetic analysis revealed that clonal sweeps were rare, suggesting that gene expression changes were unlikely to be clonally driven. Immune escape through HLA-LOH was linked to an inactive T-cell phenotype and to poor clinical treatment response. Moreover, IMC analyses showed a lower ratio of cytotoxic GranzymeB+ to PD-1+ CD4 and CD8 T cells in NRPs compared to REPs at all timepoints, indicating a less effective T-cell phenotype in NRPs. TCR analyses revealed a lack of clonal T-cell expansions in patients with poor treatment response.

Conclusions

Based on a multi-timepoint approach, we integrated multi-omic analyses for a comprehensive understanding of treatment resistance. Our study highlights profound transcriptional changes and EMT during treatmentwithout underlying clonal replacement, suggesting phenotypic plasticity as a driver for therapy resistance. The presence of HLA-LOH, a less activated T-cell phenotype and a lack of clonal T-cell expansions in patients with poor clinical treatment response suggest combined immuno-chemotherapy as a potential efficacious approach.

Clinical trial identification

NCT02287129.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

German Cancer Aid Society (Deutsche Krebshilfe) (M.B.), Cancer Research UK (M.B, A.B. and T.A.G.), the US NIH via the Cancer Systems Biology Consortium U54 scheme (CA217376) (T.A.G.), German Research Foundation (DFG 3772/1) (M.Q.), AIRC under MFAG 2020 (ID. 24913 project) (G.C.), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) (J.T.S.), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) (405344257 (SI 1549/3–2)) (J.T.S.), German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF; 01KD2206A/SATURN3) (J.T.S.). The MEMORI trial was supported by the German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). The authors acknowledge DKTK Partner site Essen, DKTK Partner site Freiburg, DKTK Partner site München. The authors acknowledge iBioTUM-Tissue and study coordinator Jens-Peter Zimmermann for management of biosamples.

Disclosure

J.T. Siveke: Other, Personal and Institutional, Invited Speaker, Funding: AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb; Other, Personal, Invited Speaker: Immunocore, MSD Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Servier; Other, Personal, Invited Speaker, Funding: Roche/Genentech; Other, Institutional, Funding: Abalos Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb; Other, Personal and Institutional, Advisory Board: Pharma15. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.