Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

191P - Evaluating sorafenib as second-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: SORA-2, an European retrospective multicenter study

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Christian Möhring

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S75-S93. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1478

Authors

C. Möhring1, M. Berger2, F. Sadeghlar3, M. Berres4, I. Radu5, C. Roderburg6, A. Vogel7, F. Sinner8, A. Pirozzi9, A. Weinmann10, U. Ehmer11, N. Ben Khaled12, T.J. Ettrich13, M. Pinter14, I. Schmidt-Wolf1, M. Schmid2, C.P. Strassburg3, M.A. Gonzalez Carmona3

Author affiliations

  • 1 UKB - Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn/DE
  • 2 Medical Faculty, University of Bonn, Bonn/DE
  • 3 University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn/DE
  • 4 Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen/DE
  • 5 University of Bern, Bern/CH
  • 6 University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf/DE
  • 7 MHH - Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover/DE
  • 8 Otto-Von-Guericke University Hospital, Magdeburg/DE
  • 9 Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano/IT
  • 10 University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz/DE
  • 11 Klinikum Rechts der Isar - Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Munich/DE
  • 12 University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich/DE
  • 13 University Hospital, Ulm/DE
  • 14 MedUni Wien - Medical University of Vienna, Vienna/AT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 191P

Background

In the last few years, first-line systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has rapidly evolved with the introduction of lenvatinib and later of immune checkpoint inhibitors, thereby making the choice of second-line (2L) treatments more difficult. Although sorafenib is commonly employed as a 2L option, there is a lack of comprehensive data supporting its efficacy in this setting. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of sorafenib as 2L therapy and factors associated with following first-line treatment failure in patients with advanced HCC.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive retrospective multicenter study, including 81 patients with advanced HCC from 12 European centers who received a systemic 2L therapy with sorafenib. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) (both from start sorafenib), therapy response and toxicity were evaluated. Factors influencing OS were analyzed univariate and multivariate to identify potential predictors of treatment efficacy.

Results

Median OS observed in the cohort was 7.4 months (95% CI: 6.6 - 13.6), with a median PFS of 3.7 months (95% CI: 3.0 - 4.8). The univariate analysis identified several factors significantly associated with improved OS, including lower ECOG performance status, Child-Pugh class A (CP A), early BCLC stage, and lower AFP levels at the initiation of sorafenib treatment. In contrast, there was no evidence that etiology or ALBI-score influences OS. Multivariate analysis revealed the best median OS for patients with CP A and AFP levels < 400 ng/ml (15.5 months). Notably, adverse events (AE) of grade ≥3 were reported in 59.4% of patients, with hand-foot syndrome (14.5%), liver failure (13%), and diarrhea (11.6%) being the most common.

Conclusions

Sorafenib, as a 2L treatment in a real-world European cohort of advanced HCC patients, demonstrates only modest efficacy with moderate tolerability. Identifying predictive factors for response and survival could help refining patient selection for this treatment strategy. This study contributes to the understanding of the role of sorafenib in the 2L setting and underscores the need for further research to optimize treatment algorithms for advanced HCC.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

A. Vogel: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Amgen, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim Mannheim, BMS, Eisai, Incyte, Ipsen, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Servier, Tahio. U. Ehmer: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Bayer, MSD, Eisai; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, Eisai, MSD, the FALK foundation, Ipsen, Novartis. M. Pinter: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Ipsen, Lilly, MSD, Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Ipsen, Lilly, MSD, Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel support: Bayer, BMS, Ipsen, Roche. M.A. Gonzalez Carmona: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche, Eisai, MSD, BMS, AstraZeneca, Servier. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.