Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

508P - Efficacy and safety of transradial versus transfemoral access during transarterial radioembolization in liver tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Hatem Eldeeb

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S205-S215. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1483

Authors

H. Eldeeb

Author affiliations

  • Al Azhar University, Cairo/EG

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 508P

Background

Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) represents a minimally invasive interventional radiation therapy, integrating embolization and radiation for cancer treatment. This meta-analysis seeks to systematically compare the efficacy and safety of the transradial approach (TRA) against the transfemoral approach (TFA) in the context of TARE for liver tumors.

Methods

We conducted an extensive search across multiple databases, including PubMed, SCOPUS, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Web of Science, to identify pertinent clinical trials and observational studies. The focus was on studies comparing the transradial approach (TRA) versus the transfemoral approach (TFA) for transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in the treatment of liver tumors. Pooled results were scrutinized for various parameters, encompassing procedure time, fluoroscopy time, air kerma (mGy), dose-area product (DAP, mGy-cm2), pain in the recovery room post-procedure, overall pain during the procedure, and adverse events.The quality assessment of the included studies was conducted using Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 tool for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. Subsequently, data analysis was performed utilizing the REVMAN 5.4.1. software.

Results

Six studies, encompassing one RCT and five cohort studies and involving a total of 1,209 patients, underwent comprehensive analysis. The aggregated findings revealed a notable reduction in procedure duration associated with the TRA (MD = -6.30, 95% CI [-9.88 to -2.73], P = 0.005). However, no statistically significant disparities were identified between TRA and the TFA in terms of fluoroscopy time, air kerma, DAP, pain in the recovery room, pain overall during the procedure, and adverse events (P = 0.50, P = 0.76, P = 0.96, P = 0.40, P = 0.49, P=0.62, respectively).

Conclusions

Our results indicate that bothTRA and TFA exhibit comparable safety and efficacy in the context of TARE for liver tumors. Notably, TRA holds the advantage of a significantly shorter procedure duration.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The author.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

The author has declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.