Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

526P - DPYD polymorphisms in patients with gastrointestinal cancers: Prevalence and impact on fluoropyrimidine tolerability- An Italian single institution experience

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Chiara Carlomagno

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S205-S215. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1483

Authors

M. D'Amato1, G. Iengo2, N. Massa3, S. de Placido4, C. Carlomagno1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II - Scuola di Medicina e Chirurgia, Napoli/IT
  • 2 Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Federico II, Napoli/IT
  • 3 University of Naples Federico II, Napoli/IT
  • 4 Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Federico II, 80131 - Napoli/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 526P

Background

Fluoropyrimidines are metabolized in the liver by the enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), encoded by the DPYD gene. About 7% of the European population is a carrier of DPYD gene polymorphisms associated with reduced DPD enzyme activity. The aims of the present retrospective analysis are: 1) to assess the prevalence of DPYD gene polymorphisms in a real world series of Italian patients with gastrointestinal malignancies; 2) to evaluate the impact of the DPYD testing on the frequency of severe toxicities, fluoropyrimidine dose reduction, and treatment delay.

Methods

300 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of gastrointestinal malignancy and treated with a fluoropyrimidine-based regimen are included in the analysis and divided in two cohorts: A) including 149 patients who started fluoropyrimidines after DPYD testing; B) including 151 patients treated without DPYD testing. Among the patients in cohort A, 15% tested only the DPYD*2A polymorphism, 19% tested four polymorphisms (DPYD*2A, HapB3, c.2846A>T and DPYD*13) and 66% tested five polymorphisms, including DPYD*6.

Results

Overall, 14.8% of patients resulted to be carriers of a DPYD variant, the most common being DPYD*6 (12.1%). Patients in cohort A reported fewer ≥ G3 toxicities (p = 0.00098), particularly fewer non-haematological toxicities (p = 0.0028) as compared with cohort B, while there was no statistically significant difference between the two cohorts in haematological toxicities (p = 0.6944). Significantly fewer chemotherapy dose reductions (p = 0.00002) were detected in cohort A with respect to cohort B, while there was no statistically significant difference in chemotherapy delay (p = 0.09136).

Conclusions

Although the sample size is limited and the analysis is retrospective, it provides additional information on the prevalence of DPYD polymorphisms in the Italian population and highlights the role of pharmacogenetic testing prior to treatment with fluoropyrimidines, in order to spare severe toxicity.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.