Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

484P - Clinical and biologic characteristic of gastro-esophageal cancers (GECs) harboring CLDN18::ARHGAP fusions

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Axel Grothey

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S162-S204. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1482

Authors

A. Grothey1, A. Fifield2, K. Sweeney2, H.J. Lenz3, M. Oberley2, S. Goel4, B. Somer1

Author affiliations

  • 1 West Cancer Center, Germantown/US
  • 2 Caris Life Sciences - Headquarters, Irving/US
  • 3 University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles/US
  • 4 Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 484P

Background

Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) overexpression has recently emerged as a therapeutic target in advanced GEC. CLDN18::ARHGAP fusions are pathognomonic for GEC, but their biologic relevance in this malignancy is poorly understood. We analyzed the correlation of CLDN18::ARHGAP fusions with other molecular parameters, patient characteristics, and clinical outcomes in a large clinico-genomic database.

Methods

DNA and RNA (whole transcriptome) sequencing was performed for patient tumor samples submitted to Caris Life Sciences. CLDN18::ARHGAP fusions were identified from RNA transcripts. CLDN18 (43-14A; ≥2+, ≥75%) and HER2 (4b5; ≥3+, ≥10%) protein levels were determined by IHC. TMB-High (TMB-H) was defined as ≥10 mutations/Mb. Significance was tested using Mann-Whitney, Fisher’s Exact, or Chi-squared tests. Real-world overall survival (OS) was obtained from insurance claims data and calculated from collection date to time of last contact; associated hazard ratios (HR) and p-values were calculated using the Cox proportional hazard model.

Results

Among 4430 GEC cases, 262 patients (5.9%) harbored a CLDN18::ARHGAP fusion, primarily CLDN18::ARHGAP26(N=226). Fusion-positive patients were more commonly female (64% vs 41%, p<0.0001) and younger (median age=58 vs 66, p<0.0001), had more HER2 (9.7% vs 3.4%, p<0.0001) and HER3 (10.5% vs 3.8% p<0.0001) mutations, fewer RHOA (0% vs 7.5%, p<0.0001), CDH1 (3.9% vs 20.4%, p<0.0001), and KRAS (2.7% vs 10.0%, p=0.0001) mutations, and were less often TMB-H (4.8% vs 13.9%, p=0.0001) or dMMR/MSI-H (3.9% vs 9.5%, p=0.0021). There were no significant differences in HER2 or HER3 mRNA levels by fusion status, though fewer fusion-positive cases were HER2 IHC+ (2.7% vs 6.0%, p=0.0461). Median CLDN18.2 expression (22.0 vs 10.9 TPM, p<0.0001) and CLDN18 IHC+ status (79.6% vs 47.9%, p<0.0001) was higher in fusion-positive cases. There was no significant difference in median OS between fusion-positive and -negative cohorts (15.6 and 13.6 months, respectively, HR=0.893, p=0.1978).

Conclusions

CLDN18::ARHGAP fusions characterize GECs with distinct clinical and biologic features. Future studies will determine if these cancers can expand the pool of patients considered for CLDN18-targeted therapy.

Legal entity responsible for the study

West Cancer Center.

Funding

Caris Life Sciences.

Disclosure

A. Fifield, K. Sweeney, M. Oberley: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Caris Life Sciences. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.