Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 08

192P - Use of biosimulation to predict homologous recombination deficiency and PARPi benefit in patients with ovarian, pancreatic, prostate and triple negative breast cancers

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 08

Topics

Cancer Biology;  Translational Research;  Targeted Therapy;  Molecular Oncology;  Genetic and Genomic Testing

Tumour Site

Ovarian Cancer;  Breast Cancer;  Prostate Cancer;  Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Presenters

Daniel Palmer

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S238-S308. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1576

Authors

D. Palmer1, S. Kapoor2, S. Khandelwal2, Y. Ullal2, Y. Narvekar2, A. Ghosh2, A. Dey2, A. Kumar2, R. PS2, A. Tyagi2, A. Agrawal2, M.P. Castro3, J. Wingrove2, B. Greenhalf4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Cancer Research Uk Liverpool Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, University of Liverpool - Imaging Centre at Liverpool, ICaL (formerly NiCaL), L69 3GL - Liverpool/GB
  • 2 R&d, Cellworks Group Inc, 94080 - South San Francisco/US
  • 3 Medical, Cellworks Group Inc, 94080 - South San Francisco/US
  • 4 Liverpool Gcplab Facility, University of Liverpool, L69 3GF - Liverpool/GB

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 192P

Background

The use of PARP-inhibitors (PARPi) has become standard treatment for cancers with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Although current tests for HRD identify a subset of HRD patients, they do not identify all patients who will benefit and often rely primarily on BRCA status. Biosimulation incorporates multiple levels of gene and protein regulation, capturing the molecular fates of key HR components. A mechanistically-based biosimulation model that integrates a patient’s tumor-based genomic profile was used to identify HR signaling pathway dysregulation and differential response to PARPi.

Methods

Computational biosimulation (Cellworks) was performed on 4 real-world retrospective cohorts from TCGA (ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, TNBC). Model output, representing key HR pathways, was used to develop a classifier distinguishing patients with HRD, by comparing ovarian cancer BRCA wild-type (WT) patients(n=32) to BRCA-mutated patients (n=187). The locked classifier was prospectively validated in independent sets of ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer patients (n= 336, 428, 189 respectively). Efficacy scores (ES), based on biosimulated composite cell growth in response to olaparib were evaluated in relationship to predicted HRD status in patients with WT BRCA.

Results

The HRD classifier was significantly associated with the BRCA status in all 4 validation sets (logistic regression, p < 0.001) and showed predictiveness for BRCA status in ovarian (AUC = 0.863, p < 0.001), pancreatic (AUC = 0.759, p=0.002) prostate cancer (AUC = 0.717, p < 0.001) and TNBC (AUC = 0.88, p < 0.001) patients. In all four cancer types, predicted PARPi efficacy was significantly higher in in wild-type BRCA patients predicted to be HRD (ovarian p = 0.026, prostate p < 0.001, pancreatic p < 0.001, TNBC p < 0.001).

Conclusions

In this study, an HRD classifier produced through biosimulation was predictive of PARPi benefit in real-world cohorts of ovarian, prostate, pancreatic and TNBC patients with WT BRCA. Future studies will be performed to confirm the hypothesis that biosimulation has utility in identifying WT BRCA patients who may benefit from PARP therapy.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Cellworks Group, Inc.

Funding

Cellworks Group, Inc.

Disclosure

D. Palmer: Financial Interests, Personal, Research Funding: BMS, Nucana, Medannex, Bayer, Sirtex; Financial Interests, Personal, Funding: AstraZeneca, Sirtex, Boston, Guerbet, Servier, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD. S. Kapoor, S. Khandelwal, Y. Ullal, Y. Narvekar, A. Ghosh, A. Dey, A. Kumar, R. Ps, A. Tyagi, A. Agrawal, M.P. Castro, J. Wingrove: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Cellworks. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.