Abstract 92P
Background
Urothelial carcinoma (UC), the most common urinary system cancer, affects the bladder, upper urinary tract, and renal pelvis. Traditional diagnostics like urinary pathology, cystoscopy, and ureteroscopy are limited by sensitivity and patient compliance issues, highlighting the need for accurate, non-invasive diagnostics. This study examines the use of Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) for urinary tumor DNA (utDNA) analysis, showcasing its potential as a diagnostic tool for UC.
Methods
This ongoing clinical trial is enrolling 250 patients with symptoms indicative of UC. So far, 20 patients have provided 40 ml urine samples for centralized analysis using two liquid biopsy assays: PredicineCARE (targeted NGS) and PredicineSCORE (low-pass WGS). These assays detect genomic alterations in utDNA, aiming to identify tumor fractions in urine. Their diagnostic efficacy is being evaluated against imaging, cystoscopy, ureteroscopy, and urinary pathology.
Results
In the 20 patients assessed, UC was confirmed in 11, 7 tested negative, and 2 cases remained uncertain. utDNA testing detected tumor fractions in all confirmed and uncertain UC cases, achieving 100% sensitivity and 71.4% specificity. Genomic profiling found 260 mutations and 24 copy number variants, with significant alterations in genes like TP53 and FGFR2/3, pointing to potential FGFR inhibitor treatments. The median urinary copy number burden (uCNB) score, derived from LP-WGS, distinguished between UC-positive and UC-negative patients with significant differences (median score of 9.04 in UC-positive vs. 5.97 in UC-negative, p=0.004). A uCNB threshold of 7.58 accurately identified 8 UC patients with 100% specificity and 73% sensitivity. Clinically UC-negative patients had negative uCNB scores, while one uncertain case tested positive, validating utDNA results and underscoring uCNB's value as a confirmatory biomarker.
Conclusions
The utDNA and uCNB analyses in this study demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, offering promising non-invasive diagnostic options for UC. These methods also have the potential to facilitate personalized therapy, improving patient management in urothelial carcinoma.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
H. Tang, C. Jia, F. Xie, Y. Zhang, S. Jia: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Huidu. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1781P - Multi-omics of soft tissue sarcomas with complex karyotypes: Investigating genomic and transcriptomic differences between cell lines of the same subtype
Presenter: Miriam Arrulo
Session: Poster session 07
1782P - Assessing the role of denosumab in managing aneurysmal bone cysts: A scoping review
Presenter: Vinesh Sandhu
Session: Poster session 07
1783P - Genetic predisposition in adult sarcoma patients: Beyond TP53
Presenter: Olivia Rohr
Session: Poster session 07
1784TiP - Pasireotide as maintenance treatment in SSTR2/3/5-expressing synovial sarcoma and desmoplastic small round cell tumor: The PAMSARC study
Presenter: Richard Schlenk
Session: Poster session 07
1785TiP - PERELI, a phase II, open label, multicenter study of pemigatinib and retifanlimab in advanced dedifferentiated liposarcoma
Presenter: Helena Nyström
Session: Poster session 07
1787P - Intracranial response in patients (pts) with baseline (BL) brain metastases (BM) and extensive-stage (ES) small cell lung cancer (SCLC) treated with ifinatamab deruxtecan (I-DXd) in the IDeate-Lung01 study
Presenter: Melissa Johnson
Session: Poster session 07
1790P - Phase II data of lurbinectedin (LUR) and irinotecan (IRI) in relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients (pts) with chemotherapy-free interval (CTFI)>30 days (d)
Presenter: Jon Zugazagoitia
Session: Poster session 07