Abstract 1492P
Background
The aim of this study was to investigate the LACE index to predict the risk of 30-day unplanned hospital readmission in patients receiving immunotherapy. Since hospitalisation is a common and costly condition, we evaluated this score in non-small cell metastatic lung cancer patients receiving immunotherapy.
Methods
Between January 2020 and December 2023, 157 patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer receiving immunotherapy in our center were screened. Patients who died during hospitalisation, patients admitted for chemotherapy and day care procedures, and subsequent hospitalisation within a month were excluded. LACE index model includes the length of hospitalization stay (L), acuity of the admission (A), comorbidities of patients (C), and the number of emergency department visits in the six months before admission (E). LACE index scores of the patients were calculated according to this model.
Results
A total of 72 metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients hospitalised in our oncology inpatient clinic were included in the study. Thirty-five (48.6%) of the patients were over 65 years of age. Most of the patients had lung adenocarcinoma (n:49, 68.1%). Twenty-one (29.2%) patients had cranial metastases. Forty-four (61.1%) patients were hospitalised for palliative care and 28 (38.9%) were hospitalized due to infection. The median hospital stay of the patients was four days (min-max: 1- 30). The median LACE score of the patients was 11 (min-max: 6-16). Fourty-six (% 63.9) patients had a high LACE score, twenty-six were in the moderate group. Thirty (65.2%) of 46 patients with high LACE scores were readmitted to the hospital within 30 days. This rate was statistically significantly higher (p: 0.028) than the moderate group (n=10, 38.5%). While 45.7% of the patient group with a high LACE score died within 90 days, this rate was (26.9%) in the moderate patient group (p: 0.11).
Conclusions
The LACE index predicted one-month readmission in oncology patients receiving immunotherapy but was insufficient to predict death within 90 days. It can be considered as an easy-to-use index in patients receiving immunotherapy to predict readmission.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1554P - Co payments in cancer patients: Analysis and estimating OOP
Presenter: Krishnamani Kalpathi
Session: Poster session 10
1555P - Estimating the social value of immuno-oncology (IO) therapies in Japan
Presenter: Tomoya Ohno
Session: Poster session 10
1556P - Current landscape of drug approvals for genitourinary (GU) cancers in North America and Europe
Presenter: Jose Tapia
Session: Poster session 10
1557P - The use of patient experience in UK NICE decision making in oncology
Presenter: Noemi Muszbek
Session: Poster session 10
1558P - Independent validation of the Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (Gail model) for predicting breast cancer risk in Egyptian population
Presenter: Elaria Yacoub
Session: Poster session 10
1559P - Equity of access and clinical impact of genomic testing in patients with cancer in a UK early phase clinical trials unit
Presenter: Jonathan Poon
Session: Poster session 10
1560P - Optimal age versus real age in breast and gynaecological risk reducing surgery in BRCA1/2 carriers
Presenter: Alberta Ferrari
Session: Poster session 10
1561P - Targeted screening methodologies to select high risk individuals: LungFlag performance in Estonia Lung Cancer Screening Pilot
Presenter: Tanel Laisaar
Session: Poster session 10
1562P - The feasibility of polygenic risk score-based population screening for breast cancer: The experience from the BRIGHT study in Estonia
Presenter: Anni Lepland
Session: Poster session 10
1563P - Increasing the earlier detection of lung cancer: A toolbox for change
Presenter: Helena Wilcox
Session: Poster session 10