Abstract 46P
Background
Lenvatinib has been identified as a multikinase inhibitor with the effect of inhibiting angiogenesis for advanced ICC. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of GEMOX and PD-1 inhibitors combined with or without lenvatinib as first-line therapy for advanced ICC.
Methods
Eligible participants with treatment naive and diagnosis of unresectable advanced ICC were assigned to G-P-L group: gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks), oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2on day 1 every 3 weeks), PD-1 inhibitors and lenvatinib (12 mg for weight ≥ 60 kg or 8 mg for weight < 60 kg, once daily), and G-P group: gemcitabine, oxaliplatin and PD-1 inhibitors. The primary endpoints was to assess objective response rate (ORR) evaluated with mRECIST 1.1 and adverse events (AEs). Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Genetic mutation biomarkers for lenvatinib were explored using WES.
Results
77 patients were enrolled and divided into G-P-L group (n=38) and G-P group (n=39). The median follow-up time was 23 months. The median PFS were 13 months in the G-P-L group and 7.9 months in the G-P group (hazard ratio[HR]: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.20–0.71, P=0.007). The median OS were 18.5 months in the G-P-L group and 14.6 months in the G-P group (P=0.19). No significant differences of grade ≥ 3 AEs were found between the G-P-L group and the G-P group (68.4% and 64.1%). ORR, DCR were 39.5% and 89.5% in the G-P-L group versus 33.3% and 76.9% in the G-P group, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that with or without Lenvatinib combination was the independent risk factor of PFS in the entire group (P=0.002). Keap-1 gene mutation was found with significant difference in PR group comparing with SD and PD group in the G-P-L group (P=0.003).
Conclusions
GEMOX combined with PD-1 inhibitor and lenvatinib indicated the feasibility as first-line therapy for advanced ICC with Keap-1 gene mutation. Multi-center with large scale of cases study were needed for further exploration.
Clinical trial identification
NCT05215665.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2019P - Disparities in urothelial carcinoma (UC) drug approval: Contrasting North America and Europe
Presenter: Jose Tapia
Session: Poster session 13
2020TiP - SOGUG-NEOWIN: A phase II, open-label, multi-centre trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of erdafitinib (ERDA) monotherapy and ERDA and cetrelimab (CET) as neoadjuvant treatment in cisplatin-ineligible patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and FGFR gene alterations
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster session 13
2022TiP - Stereotactic treatment with neoadjuvant radiotherapy and enfortumab vedotin: A phase I/II study for localized, cisplatin ineligible, muscle invasive bladder cancer (STAR-EV)
Presenter: Tian Zhang
Session: Poster session 13
2024TiP - NETOS: A personalized approach of neoadjuvant therapy, including INCB099280 monotherapy and bladder preservation, for muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma (MIBC) with ctDNA monitoring
Presenter: Valentina Tateo
Session: Poster session 13