Abstract 1669P
Background
Studies have shown that patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) linked to human papillomavirus (HPV) experience shame and/or guilt due to the association of HPV with sexual transmission. Likewise, such feelings were also reported by cervical cancer (CC) patients. Understanding the similarities or differences in the relationship between guilt, shame, and quality of life (QoL) among these two groups might shed light on effective psychosocial interventions.
Methods
The study employed a cross-sectional design. Patients diagnosed with CIN (n=105, 11.42% CIN 1, 15.23% CIN 2, 58.09% CIN 3, 8.57% unknown) and CC (n=87, 16.09% stage 1, 17.24% stage 2, 36.78% stage 3, 8.04% stage 4, 8.04% were diagnosed with CIN that later progressed, 8.04% were uncertain about their stage at diagnosis, 5.74% unknown) who were recruited through social networks specific to CIN and CC patients completed self-report questionnaires assessing demographic information, medical history, QoL, and feelings of shame and guilt.
Results
The preliminary results revealed a significant negative association between both guilt and shame and QoL in both groups. However, no significant difference in QoL was found between CIN and CC patients (57.12, 52.26 respectively, p=0.1). Additionally, a significant higher level of guilt was reported by CIN patients (13.42) compared to CC patients (10.26) (d=0.58, p=0.0001). There was no significant difference in shame reported by CIN patients compared to CC patients (12.8, 11.37 respectively, p=0.07).
Conclusions
The findings underscore the detrimental role of shame and guilt in the perception of QoL of patients with CIN and CC. Addressing these negative feelings through targeted interventions may be crucial for improving overall well-being in these populations and enhancing their coping mechanisms. Further research involving a larger sample size may provide deeper insights into the differences and similarities between CIN and CC patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
HaBait Shel Bar - Israel Women's Cancer Association (RA) in collaboration with Ariel University.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1709P - Outcomes with novel combinations in non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC): ORACLE study
Presenter: Deepak Kilari
Session: Poster session 11
1710P - Exposure-response (E/R) relationship of nivolumab (N) and ipilimumab (I) in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell clear cell carcinoma (mRCC) from the randomised phase II BIONIKK study
Presenter: Benoit Blanchet
Session: Poster session 11
1711P - Real-word data challenging the treatment paradigm in metastatic renal cancer: Time to separate IMDC intermediate / poor risk groups?
Presenter: John McGrane
Session: Poster session 11
1712P - Real-world efficacy of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab and its practical predictive biomarkers in advanced renal cell carcinoma: First analysis from RENOIR study [KCSG GU22-13]
Presenter: Jwa Hoon Kim
Session: Poster session 11
1713P - A deep learning approach utilizing the electronic health record (EHR) to identify cancer recurrence in renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
Presenter: Jue Hou
Session: Poster session 11
1714P - Detection and monitoring of translocation renal cell carcinoma via epigenomic profiling of cell-free DNA
Presenter: Simon Garinet
Session: Poster session 11
1715P - Interim analysis results from a phase II study of adjuvant penpulimab in very high-risk clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Xu Zhang
Session: Poster session 11
1716P - Primary resistance to front-line immune-based combinations in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (ARON-1)
Presenter: martina catalano
Session: Poster session 11