Abstract 1661TiP
Background
Neoadjuvant therapy (NT) was reported to be associated with improved pathological outcomes, but was of limited value in improving the survival outcomes for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (PC), which may be attribute to the heterogeneous nature of PC. Additionally, several clinical trials demonstrated that NT followed by radical prostatectomy (RP) may improve the oncological outcomes of oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC). With the advancement of molecular sequencing techniques and targeted agents approved for special populations, genomic biomarker-guided NT for PC has been rapidly evolving and assumed to improve the prognosis outcomes.
Trial design
The ongoing SEGNO trial is an open-label, multi-arm, Phase 2 study assessing the safety, efficacy of genomic biomarker-guided NT for locally advanced PC and OMPC (defined as no visceral metastasis and ≤5 bone metastases). According to the results of the genomic profile, participants (N = 40) will be assigned to 4 NT groups: Arm 1: Homologous recombination repair (HRR) alterations (BRCA1/2) (Rezvilutamide: 240 mg PO QD + goserelin microspheres: 3.6 mg IM Q4W + parmiparib: 60 mg PO QD); Arm 2: HRR alterations (except BRCA1/2 and CDK12) (Rezvilutamide: 240 mg PO QD + goserelin microspheres: 3.6 mg IM Q4W + cisplatin: 70 mg/m2 IV Q3W); Arm 3: MSI-H/dMMR, TMB≥10 mut/Mb or CDK12 alterations without other HRR alterations (Rezvilutamide: 240 mg PO QD + goserelin microspheres: 3.6 mg IM Q4W + tislelizumab: 200 mg IV Q3W); Arm 4: No targetable actionable aberration (Rezvilutamide: 240 mg PO QD + goserelin microspheres: 3.6 mg IM Q4W + docetaxel: 70 mg/m2 IV Q3W). A following prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/ computed tomography and RP plus pelvic lymph node dissection will be performed after 6 cycles of NT. The primary endpoints are rates of clinical complete response, pathological minimal residual disease (defined as residual tumor 5 mm or less) and complete pathologic response. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, progression-free survival and safety outcomes.
Clinical trial identification
NCT06387056.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University.
Funding
BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd. and Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1709P - Outcomes with novel combinations in non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC): ORACLE study
Presenter: Deepak Kilari
Session: Poster session 11
1710P - Exposure-response (E/R) relationship of nivolumab (N) and ipilimumab (I) in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell clear cell carcinoma (mRCC) from the randomised phase II BIONIKK study
Presenter: Benoit Blanchet
Session: Poster session 11
1711P - Real-word data challenging the treatment paradigm in metastatic renal cancer: Time to separate IMDC intermediate / poor risk groups?
Presenter: John McGrane
Session: Poster session 11
1712P - Real-world efficacy of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab and its practical predictive biomarkers in advanced renal cell carcinoma: First analysis from RENOIR study [KCSG GU22-13]
Presenter: Jwa Hoon Kim
Session: Poster session 11
1713P - A deep learning approach utilizing the electronic health record (EHR) to identify cancer recurrence in renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
Presenter: Jue Hou
Session: Poster session 11
1714P - Detection and monitoring of translocation renal cell carcinoma via epigenomic profiling of cell-free DNA
Presenter: Simon Garinet
Session: Poster session 11
1715P - Interim analysis results from a phase II study of adjuvant penpulimab in very high-risk clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Xu Zhang
Session: Poster session 11
1716P - Primary resistance to front-line immune-based combinations in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (ARON-1)
Presenter: martina catalano
Session: Poster session 11