Abstract 1552P
Background
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells and bispecific antibodies (BsAb) have substantially improved outcomes for lymphoid neoplasms (LN), but the differences in regulatory approval for these products remain unexplored.
Methods
We identified 12 indications for six CAR-T cell products and nine indications for seven BsAb approved in the US for LN from January 2010 to September 2023. Public databases (FDA, EMA, and PMDA) were used to collect information on regulatory approvals for these products in the US, EU, and Japan.
Results
In the US, excluding two indications in the CAR-T group for second-line large B-cell lymphoma, all 19 indications were approved based on single-arm trials. 2/12 (17%) in the CAR-T group and 8/9 (89%) in the BsAb group received accelerated approval. In both the CAR-T and the BsAb groups, myeloma indications in the US are limited to patients with more prior therapies than in the EU or in Japan. In the EU, pivotal trials for each indication were almost identical to those in the US (92% in the CAR-T group and 100% in the BsAb group). In similar to the US, conditional approval was more common in the BsAb group (7/9, 78%) than in the CAR-T group (4/12, 33%). Approval of the pediatric indication tended to be judged more strictly by the trial setting in the EU than in the US. In Japan, most of the pivotal trials for each indication were the same as in the US for the CAR-T group (7/9, 78%), while 2/3 of the BsAb group required additional Japanese domestic trials to obtain Japanese data. Unlike in the US and the EU, all indications (9/9 in the CAR-T group and 3/3 in the BsAb group) were granted regular approval in Japan.
Conclusions
Most indications of CAR-T and BsAb were approved based on single-arm studies in the US, EU, and Japan, but some differences in regulatory actions were observed among the agencies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
K. Matsuda: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: Kyowa Kirin, SymBio, AbbVie. S. Nagai: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: Takara Bio Inc, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1607P - Association of the lipid biomarker, PCPro, and clinical outcomes in the ENZAMET trial (ANZUP 1304)
Presenter: Lisa Horvath
Session: Poster session 10
1608P - Prostate cancer working group 4 (PCWG4) preliminary criteria using serial PSMA PET/CT for response evaluation: Analysis from the PRINCE trial
Presenter: Michael Hofman
Session: Poster session 10
1609P - PSMA-PET and PROMISE re-define stage and risk in patients with prostate cancer
Presenter: Wolfgang Fendler
Session: Poster session 10
1610P - Circulating tumour cell (CTC) enumeration and overall survival (OS) in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with xaluritamig
Presenter: Andrew Armstrong
Session: Poster session 10
1611P - Haematologic impact of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus ARPI change in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in PSMAfore
Presenter: Kim Nguyen Chi
Session: Poster session 10
1612P - Impact of FANCA, ATM, CDK12 alterations on survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: David Lorente
Session: Poster session 10
1613P - Clinically advanced prostate cancer (CAPC) featuring BRCA2 loss: A comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) study
Presenter: Chiara Mercinelli
Session: Poster session 10
1614P - PSA responses and PSMA scan changes after immunotherapy for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (BCR) without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)
Presenter: Ravi Madan
Session: Poster session 10
1615P - A new prognostic model of overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC)
Presenter: Susan Halabi
Session: Poster session 10