Abstract 330P
Background
High RANK mRNA levels were linked with several adverse prognostic factors in breast cancer. The present study aims to assess the activity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with denosumab compared to chemotherapy alone in premenopausal patients with hormonal receptors (HR) positive, HER2 negative breast cancer.
Methods
In this single centre randomized phase II study, we enrolled patients with ER Allred score 4-8 at diagnostic biopsy with either locally advanced inoperable tumours or tumours that need downsizing to allow for breast conservative surgery (BCS). Enrolled patients were randomised between neoadjuvant chemotherapy (4 cycles of epirubicin/doxorubicin with cyclophosphamide and 4 cycles of docetaxel) and denosumab vs. the same chemotherapy alone. Patients in the experimental arm received subcutaneous denosumab 120 mg starting with 1st chemotherapy cycle and then with every other cycle (total of 4 doses). Residual cancer burden (RCB) was the primary endpoint.
Results
We recruited 50 patients (26 in control arm, 24 in experimental arm). Different baseline characteristics were balanced between the 2 arms including age at diagnosis, ER Allred score (≤6 vs. >6), PR status, Ki67 level, clinical-T, clinical N stage, and clinical stage (stage II vs. III). Noteworthy, 86% of patients were node-positive, 44% had cT4 tumours and 80% had ER Allred score >6. Two patients in the control arm did not undergo breast surgery (1 lost follow up, 1 had local progression). No difference in the rate of BCS (58.3% in both arms). No difference in RCB between control and experimental arms (RCB 0-1: 25% vs 20.8%, respectively, p=0.73). Similarly, no difference in pathological T-stage (pT0-1: 87.5% vs 70.8%, p=0.29), pathological N-stage (N0: 41.7% vs 29.2%, p=0.55) or pathological stage (41.6% vs 33.3%, p=0.75). No significant difference in adverse events profiles between the two arms.
Conclusions
Adding denosumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with lower RCB or improved pathological stage in premenopausal HR+/HER2-negative breast cancer patients with comparable rate of BCS. No new safety signal with the addition of denosumab.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
King Abdullah Medical City, Saudi Arabia.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
301P - Changes in lipid-levels following aromatase inhibitor treatment in early postmenopausal breast cancer
Presenter: Marie Lund
Session: Poster session 14
302P - Perceptions of women with HER2+ breast cancer on the risk of recurrence and disease management: Results from the ASKHER survey
Presenter: Matteo Lambertini
Session: Poster session 14
303P - Predicting quality of life trajectories in young women with breast cancer: 5-year results from a large prospective cohort
Presenter: Bryan Vaca-Cartagena
Session: Poster session 14
304P - Impact of estrogen receptor positivity for adjuvant endocrine therapy in luminal T1a/bN0M0 breast cancer: A multi-institutional retrospective observational study
Presenter: Shinsuke Sasada
Session: Poster session 14
305P - Prognosis of isolated locoregional recurrence after early breast cancer with immediate breast reconstruction surgery: A retrospective multi-institutional study
Presenter: Hirohito Seki
Session: Poster session 14
306P - Patient-reported symptoms in early breast cancer and future cardiovascular events: A province-wide administrative database study
Presenter: Edith Pituskin
Session: Poster session 14
307P - Exposure to Di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate and breast cancer incidence: A cohort study
Presenter: Lijuan Tang
Session: Poster session 14
308P - Impact of the COVID-19 (C19) pandemic on breast cancer (BC) treatment patterns in the US
Presenter: Mariana Chavez Mac Gregor
Session: Poster session 14
310P - Identification of racial disparities across MammaPrint and BluePrint subtypes in HR+HER2- breast cancer
Presenter: Sonya Reid
Session: Poster session 14