Abstract 1154P
Background
High tumor mutational burden (TMBh), a biomarker of benefit from CPI, may be induced by alkylating agents. The frequency of this phenomenon and the associated outcomes in patients (pts) with NEN are unknown.
Methods
Consecutive pts with metastatic NEN whose tumor progressed (PD) after CAPTEM (temozolomide-based regimen) had liquid and/or tumor tissue biopsy profiled by NGS. We evaluated the incidence of TMBh (≥ 10/mb), associated clinical and molecular features, and pts outcomes.
Results
From June 2020 to December 2023, 32 pts treated with alkylating agents had PD and had their tumors profiled: 23 (72%) had pancreatic NEN, and 10 (31%) developed TMB-h (median 51.5; 15 to 216), mostly detected by liquid NGS (90%). TMBh pts, compared with TMB low, received more CAPTEM cycles (mean number/pt: 10.6 vs 6) and showed a favorable trend in objective response rates (40% vs 20%; p 0.24), but were often pre-treated with PRRT and CAPTEM prior to NGS (60% vs 22.7%; p 0.03); TMBh tumors were microsatellite stable and presented more defects in DNA damage response and repair (DDR) genes (60% vs 18%; p 0.05) and in MMR genes (60% vs 0%; p 0.0004), although these were mostly subclonal. 8/10 TMBh pts had initial G1/G2 tumors, with 7 having biopsy upon PD: 5 became G3. Five TMBh pts received CPI: 2 had upfront PD (no DDR or MMR genes defects in NGS), one had disease control for 8 months (subclonal MSH6 mutated), 2 had major ongoing response (both MUTYH [VAF 5% and 62%] and MMR genes mutated). One pt experienced stable disease with sunitinib for 11 months and one pt died of PD 3 weeks after TMBh was identified.
Conclusions
TMBh NEN induced by alkylating agents occurs in about one third of cases, is more frequently associated with prior PRRT exposure, often develops from initial G2 that transform into G3 NEN, and most present subclonal defects in MMR and in DDR genes. TMBh alone does not seem to predict response to CPI in this context; yet, pts with somatic MUTYH and MMR genes pathogenic variants may derive benefit from CPI.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1427P - Predicting overall survival and prognostic indicator genes in esophagogastric cancer patients using machine learning and bioinformatics analysis
Presenter: Nguyen-Kieu Viet-Nhi
Session: Poster session 17
1428P - Total neoadjuvant FLOT chemotherapy in oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma: An international cohort study
Presenter: Hollie Clements
Session: Poster session 17
1429P - Differences in esophageal cancer incidence and survival by race/ethnicity: A SEER analysis
Presenter: Ashwin Kulshrestha
Session: Poster session 17
1430P - Impact of menadione supplementation in the treatment of patients with metastatic gastric cancer: A randomized phase II clinical trial
Presenter: Francisco Cezar Moraes
Session: Poster session 17
1431P - Assessing pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A deep learning approach with voxel-level radiomics
Presenter: Yongling Ji
Session: Poster session 17
1432P - Safety of laparoscopic D2 distal gastrectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer patients: A prospective multicenter trial (CLASS-03a)
Presenter: Kun Yang
Session: Poster session 17