Abstract 1582P
Background
Emerging evidence suggests that the defective homologous recombination repair (HRR) of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in human trophoblast cells may induce spontaneous miscarriage (SM), as indicated by lower levels of BRCA1/RAD51 and higher levels of DSBs in villous tissue samples of recurrent SM. Furthermore, cancer therapies can induce DNA damage not only in cancer cells but also in healthy cells, including oocytes. Oocytes have the capacity to repair DSBs during meiosis. DNA damage in oocytes induces meiotic errors, leading to abnormalities and increased susceptibility to SM.
Methods
This was a real-world, hospital-based, study, including EOC patients undergoing BRCA1/2 tumor (t), germline (g), and genomic instability testing between May 2015 and May 2024. In the current analysis we investigate cumulative incidence of pregnancy and miscarriage according to BRCA1/2 mutational status (presence/absence of t/g (likely)pathogenic variants, PVs), and HRD status (HRD positive/negative) assessed by myChoiceCDx/SOPHiA DDM™ assays. Patients carriers of PVs in HR no-BRCA1/2 genes were excluded.
Results
Six hundred and thirty-five (635) EOC patients were included in the analysis: 130 were carriers of gPVs in BRCA1/2 genes (20.5%): 86 in BRCA1 (66.1%) and 44 in BRCA2 (33.9%); while 33 showed tPVs (5.2%). Of the 135 samples analyzed by the HRD genomic instability test, 51 (37.8%) were identified as HRD-positive, and 69 (51.1%) as HRD-negative. When the cumulative incidence of pregnancy between the groups was compared, the difference was not significant. Notably, HRD-positive EOC patients showed a statistically significant increase in miscarriage, compared to patients in the HRD negative subgroup (31.1% vs 12.1%, respectively; p=0.02).
Conclusions
Our data suggested that pregnancy in EOC patients with HRD positive tumors is associated with increased incidence of miscarriage. Prospective validation of these findings is required. Meanwhile, oncofertility counseling, and a more in-depth assessment of risk factors, could be proposed to optimize abortion risk-management and improve fetal and obstetric outcomes.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1607P - Association of the lipid biomarker, PCPro, and clinical outcomes in the ENZAMET trial (ANZUP 1304)
Presenter: Lisa Horvath
Session: Poster session 10
1608P - Prostate cancer working group 4 (PCWG4) preliminary criteria using serial PSMA PET/CT for response evaluation: Analysis from the PRINCE trial
Presenter: Michael Hofman
Session: Poster session 10
1609P - PSMA-PET and PROMISE re-define stage and risk in patients with prostate cancer
Presenter: Wolfgang Fendler
Session: Poster session 10
1610P - Circulating tumour cell (CTC) enumeration and overall survival (OS) in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with xaluritamig
Presenter: Andrew Armstrong
Session: Poster session 10
1611P - Haematologic impact of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus ARPI change in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in PSMAfore
Presenter: Kim Nguyen Chi
Session: Poster session 10
1612P - Impact of FANCA, ATM, CDK12 alterations on survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: David Lorente
Session: Poster session 10
1613P - Clinically advanced prostate cancer (CAPC) featuring BRCA2 loss: A comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) study
Presenter: Chiara Mercinelli
Session: Poster session 10
1614P - PSA responses and PSMA scan changes after immunotherapy for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (BCR) without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)
Presenter: Ravi Madan
Session: Poster session 10
1615P - A new prognostic model of overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC)
Presenter: Susan Halabi
Session: Poster session 10