Abstract 1066P
Background
Immunotherapy (at present, it is mainly the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors such as PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors) has become the fourth pillar of tumor treatment after surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, but only about 20% of people benefit from it. In recent years, it has been shown that psychological stress can lead to poorer immunotherapy outcomes. Thus whether the use of antipsychotics can influence the efficacy of immunotherapy is a question worth exploring. Olanzapine, an atypical benzodiazepine antipsychotic, has traditionally been used to improve patients' moods. It is also effective in relieving adverse effects such as chemotherapy-related nausea and vomiting (CINV) and loss of appetite in tumor patients.
Methods
This study retrospectively analyzed tumor patients using PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University in China from 2017-2022 (n=1933), with 99 patients using olanzapine and 1,834 patients not using it. Patients using olanzapine after removal by exclusion criteria served as the experimental group (n=46), and patients not using olanzapine after PSM (1:1 propensity score matching) served as the control group (n=46). Rurvival between the two groups of patients was analyzed.
Results
Olanzapine use was associated with better immune outcomes. Compared to patients not using olanzapine, patients taking olanzapine (HR=2.599,95%CI:1.423 to 4.748, p=0.002) had better objective remission rate (ORR), performance (21.73% vs 36.95%), and longer median overall survival (OS; 10 months vs 70 months, p=0.001).
Conclusions
This study suggests that the use of olanzapine may improve the overall survival of patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, showing better immune response power.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1122P - The role of imaging during follow-up after radical surgery of stage IIb-c and III cutaneous malignant melanoma: Survival results from an interim analysis of a randomized prospective multicenter study (TRIM)
Presenter: Cecilia Ladjevardi
Session: Poster session 04
1123P - Melanoma incidence and mortality decline in younger adults in Sweden: Start of a shift in the upgoing trend?
Presenter: Hildur Helgadottir
Session: Poster session 04
1124P - Adjuvant treatment of patients with stage III melanoma: 4-year follow-up time of multicenter real-world study
Presenter: Elisabeth Livingstone
Session: Poster session 04
1125P - Accuracy of PET-CT to assess extent of nodal disease in clinical stage III melanoma
Presenter: Ronen Stoff
Session: Poster session 04
1126P - A phase II study of nivolumab/relatlimab in metastatic uveal melanoma
Presenter: Jose Lutzky
Session: Poster session 04
1127P - Subgroup analysis of FOCUS phase III trial efficacy results
Presenter: Matthew Wheater
Session: Poster session 04
1128P - Preliminary results of first-in-human study of 225-Actinium MTI-201 (225Ac-MTI-201) in metastatic uveal melanoma
Presenter: Nikhil Khushalani
Session: Poster session 04
1129P - Clinical outcomes from a tebentafusp UK expanded access program in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM)
Presenter: Paul Nathan
Session: Poster session 04
1130P - Phase II trial on nivolumab plus radiotherapy in patients with metastatic mucosal melanoma: PORTER-M3 trial
Presenter: Motoo Nomura
Session: Poster session 04
1131P - A phase II study of pembrolizumab combination with temozolomide as 1L treatment for Chinese metastatic acral melanoma patients
Presenter: Ya Ding
Session: Poster session 04