Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 04

1087P - Phase II study of niraparib in patients with advanced melanoma with homologous recombination pathway gene mutations

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 04

Topics

Clinical Research;  Targeted Therapy

Tumour Site

Melanoma

Presenters

Kevin Kim

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S712-S748. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1597

Authors

K.B. Kim1, P. Desprez2, C. Caressi2, M. Nosrati2, E. Janiczek3, J. Penafiel3, M. Kashani-Sabet1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Oncology, California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, 94107 - San Francisco/US
  • 2 N/a, California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, 94107 - San Francisco/US
  • 3 Clinical Research, California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, 94107 - San Francisco/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1087P

Background

There are a limited number of therapeutic options available for metastatic melanoma patients progressing on the checkpoint inhibitor(s) and BRAF-targeting drugs. Approximately 21-34% of metastatic melanomas harbor at least 1 molecular aberration in the HR pathway, considered pathogenic leading to HR deficiency. We conducted a phase II study of niraparib in this patient population to evaluate clinical activity.

Methods

In this single-arm, open-label trial, we assessed the overall response rate to niraparib in patients with HR-deficient, unresectable, metastatic melanoma. Eligibility required mutation in ARID1A/B, ARID2, ATM, ATR, ATRX, BARD1, BRCA1/2, BAP1, BRIP1, CHEK2, FANCD2, MRN11A, RAD50, RAD51, RAD54B or PALB2 gene;, and progression after PD1-antibody or BRAF/MEK inhibitors if BRAF mutant. Niraparib was administered orally once daily at 300 mg or 200 mg, based on body weight and platelet count.

Results

Due to a slow accrual, the enrollment was discontinued after 14 patients were enrolled and treated. Nine patients were female, a median age was 71. Nine patients had ECOG performance status of 1. The subtypes of melanoma were desmoplastic (3), acral lentiginous (2), mucosal (4), uveal (4), unspecified (1). Stages of the disease were III (3 pts) and IV (11 pts). Among the 14 treated patients, 2 (14%) patients had a partial response, and 7 (50%) had a stable disease. The median PFS was 16 weeks (range, 0-96 weeks). Among 10 patients with non-uveal melanoma, 2 (20%) patients had a partial response with a time to progression of 24 weeks, each. Five (50%) patients had a stable disease lasting 16-98 weeks. None of 4 uveal melanoma patients had a response. There were no unexpected adverse events associated with niraparibe treatment. One responder with ARID1A mutation had detectable circulating tumor DNA at baseline, but it became undetectable during the treatment.

Conclusions

Despite the relatively small number of patients, niraparib showed potential benefits in metastatic melanoma with HR gene mutations, particularly in non-uveal melanoma. Further investigation of PARPi in combination with immunotherapy or other targeted therapy is warranted.

Clinical trial identification

NCT03925350.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

K. B. Kim.

Funding

GSK.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.