Abstract 767P
Background
Women with a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer have an increased risk of ovarian cancer. Yet it remains uncertain if common ovarian cancer risk factors – especially those which can be modified - affect this high-risk population similarly to the general population.
Methods
Using the Danish and Swedish nationwide registers, we established two nested case-control study populations in women with a family history of breast and/ or ovarian cancer (2,138 ovarian cancer cases, 85,240 controls) and women without (10,730 ovarian cancer cases, 429,200 controls). The overall and histology-specific associations between ovarian cancer risk and common ovarian cancer risk factors were assessed with conditional logistic regression. The country-specific estimates were then combined based on a fixed-effect assumption.
Results
Multiparity, hysterectomy, tubal ligation, salpingectomy, and oral contraceptive (OC) use were associated with a reduced risk of ovarian cancer in both women with and without a family history, while endometriosis and menopausal hormone treatment (MHT) were associated with increased risk. Similar histology-specific associations were also found for this two groups of women: multiparity and OC use were shown with protective effects across all the histologic subtypes except mucinous ovarian cancer, risk of which was not associated with OC use; MHT was linked to an increased risk of serous ovarian cancer but a decreased risk of the mucinous and clear cell cancers; Endometriosis correlated particularly to an increased risk of endometrioid and clear cell ovarian cancer.
Conclusions
This is the largest study to date on ovarian cancer risk in relation to family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer. Existing knowledge on ovarian cancer protective factors can be considered equally valid when considering women with a family history of ovarian/breast cancer. Given the higher baseline risk for women with a family history, special attention should be paid to risk factors like endometriosis and nulliparity in this high-risk population.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Mermaid project (Mermaid III).
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
861P - Neo-TIME trial: Neoadjuvant tislelizumab combined with albumin-paclitaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil(APF) in patients with locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma (LA-OSCC)
Presenter: Wenquan Zhao
Session: Poster session 02
862P - Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy using carboplatin, nab-paclitaxel, oral metronomic therapy and low dose nivolumab for “borderline resectable” oral cavity carcinoma: A prospective phase II single-arm trial (NeoLOCUS)
Presenter: Praveen Kumar Marimuthu
Session: Poster session 02
863P - Safety and efficacy of four courses of pembrolizumab combined with carboplatin and albumin-binding paclitaxel versus two courses of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with resectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: An optimal efficacy study (prospective, two-arm, phase II)
Presenter: Jinsong Li
Session: Poster session 02
Resources:
Abstract
866P - Neoadjuvant and adjuvant AK104 in patients with recurrent, resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A phase II study
Presenter: Lei Liu
Session: Poster session 02
868P - Phase II trial of ozuriftamab vedotin (BA3021), a conditionally active biologic (CAB)-ROR2-ADC, in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN)
Presenter: Winston Wong
Session: Poster session 02
869P - Results of the multicenter phase II FRAIL-IMMUNE trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of durvalumab (D) combined with weekly paclitaxel carboplatin in 1st-line in patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN) not eligible to cisplatin
Presenter: Jérome Fayette
Session: Poster session 02