Abstract 1064P
Background
Due to increasing incidence of cancer and shortage of hospital resources there is a need for a more time-efficient work process at the hospital-daycare-unit. A large proportion of our patients are treated with monoclonal antibodies. These drugs are administered according to the infusion times stated in the drug label. In this pilot study we investigated if it is safe to reduce total infusion time for nivolumab, ipilimumab or pembrolizumab.
Methods
We included patients who received nivolumab every 3 or 4 weeks (320-480mg), ipilimumab (1 or 3 mg/kg) every 3 or 6 weeks and nivolumab (1 or 3 mg/kg) every 3 weeks or pembrolizumab (100-400mg) every 3-6 weeks. The patients had to receive ≥2 administrations without a previous infusion related reaction (IRR) grade ≥2 before they entered the intervention phase where the infusion time was reduced to respectively 15 and 10 minutes. IRRs were graded according to CTCAE v5.0 and the incidence was calculated. Secondly, patient-reported experience measures (PREM) were collected before and after shorted infusion times.
Results
In total 60 patients, 20 per cohort were included. In the nivolumab cohort one IRR grade 2 occurred during the second standard of care 30-minute infusion, and two IRRs occurred during the 15-minute infusion (one grade 1, and one grade 2). No IRRs occurred during the 10-minute infusions. In the ipilimumab/nivolumab cohort one IRR grade 2 occurred during the second standard of care 30-minute infusion of nivolumab, and one IRR grade 1 during the 10-minute infusion of nivolumab. No IRRs occurred during the infusions of ipilimumab. In the pembrolizumab cohort only one grade 1 IRR occurred during the 10-minute infusion. In all cohorts there was no IRR grade 3 or higher. Of the patients who received shorter infusion times 95% were (very) satisfied. A total of 3045 minutes were saved during the intervention phase.
Conclusions
Shorter infusion times up to 10 minutes for nivolumab, ipilimumab/nivolumab and pembrolizumab were applied without a clinical relevant increase of IRRs. Besides increasing time-efficiency, patients were very satisfied with the reduced infusion times. In conclusion, this strategy for optimizing infusion rates of monoclonal antibodies seems to be safe and for further exploration.
Clinical trial identification
NCT06031233.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Isala Hospital.
Funding
Partly funded by BMS and Research Foundation Isala Hospital.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1231P - Clinical characteristics and real-world treatment patterns in stage I-III resectable NSCLC: THASSOS-INTL study
Presenter: Kumar Prabhash
Session: Poster session 04
1233P - Genomic scarring score as a criterion for PARP inhibitor administration in early-stage NSCLC
Presenter: Apostolos Klinakis
Session: Poster session 04
1234P - Stage migration in resectable NSCLC
Presenter: Guus Heuvel
Session: Poster session 04
1235P - Pathologic response as a surrogate endpoint for event-free survival in neo-adjuvant immunotherapy trials of resectable non-small cell lung cancer: A subgroup analysis
Presenter: Nancy Huang
Session: Poster session 04
1236P - ctDNA-Lung-Detect: Profiling of non-shedding ctDNA early stage resected non-small cell lung cancers
Presenter: Sam Khan
Session: Poster session 04
1237P - Association of LRRC15 protein expression with 5-year survival in lung adenocarcinoma patients
Presenter: Jessie Woon
Session: Poster session 04
1238TiP - Combining immunotherapy with Trop2 ADc in early stage non-small cell lung cancer (CITADEL)
Presenter: Siu Ching Li
Session: Poster session 04