Abstract 1990P
Background
Recent studies showed that the combination of antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) and immune checkpoint inhibitors can bring survival benefit to advanced UC patients. MRG002 (an ADC directed against HER2) and pucotenlimab (HX008, a programmed death 1 inhibitor) showed enhanced antitumor activity in preclinical studies. This phase I/II study was to evaluate the safety and activity of combination therapy in mUC patients who failed 1st line chemotherapy or not suitable for cisplatin as 1L therapy.
Methods
IIn dose-escalation stage (Phase I), Eligible patients were assigned to MRG002 at cohort of 1.8mg/kg or 2.2mg/kg Q3W, combined with HX008 3mg/kg (cap with 200mg) Q3W. The primary endpoint was safety/tolerability and recommended MRG002 dose; secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics, ORR per RECIST 1.1, PFS, and OS.
Results
As the data cut-off (Apr 19 2024), 33 HER2-expressing mUC patients, (19 males, median age 67y [43-77]) were enrolled. The majority (26/33, 78.8%) were systemic treatment naïve. HER2 expression was positive (defined as IHC 2+ or 3+) in 89.4% pts (28/33). The recommended dose for MRG002 was 1.8mg/kg. For all the evaluated patients, the ORR and DCR were 67.9% (19/28) and 89.0% (25/28). For MRG002 at 1.8 mg/kg cohort, the ORR and DCR of evaluable pts were 75.0% (15/20) and 90.0% (18/20). For HER2+ pts, the ORR and DCR of evaluable pts were 76.5% (13/17) and 94.1% (16/17). The longest patient treated has had a PFS for more than 26.5 months and still ongoing.With a median follow-up visit of 7.9 months, the 12-month PFS-rate was 84% (95%CI, 0.63, 0.94), 12-months DOR rate was 100%. The median PFS and DOR was not reached. Most common treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) were asthenia (42.4%), neuropathy (39.4%), weight loss (27.3%), diarrhea (27.3%), constipation (27.3%), rash (24.2%), alopecia (21.2%), and fever (21.2%). Only 3 pts experienced grade 3-4 TRAEs (9.1%), and only 1 patient discontinued treatment due to TRAE (3.0%).
Conclusions
Compared with other combination of IO+ADCs, MRG002+HX008 results less incidence of grade 3/4 toxicities, and can bring durable progression-free survival benefit. Further evaluation of safety and efficacy is ongoing.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Lepu Biopharma Co., Ltd.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2019P - Disparities in urothelial carcinoma (UC) drug approval: Contrasting North America and Europe
Presenter: Jose Tapia
Session: Poster session 13
2020TiP - SOGUG-NEOWIN: A phase II, open-label, multi-centre trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of erdafitinib (ERDA) monotherapy and ERDA and cetrelimab (CET) as neoadjuvant treatment in cisplatin-ineligible patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and FGFR gene alterations
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster session 13
2022TiP - Stereotactic treatment with neoadjuvant radiotherapy and enfortumab vedotin: A phase I/II study for localized, cisplatin ineligible, muscle invasive bladder cancer (STAR-EV)
Presenter: Tian Zhang
Session: Poster session 13
2024TiP - NETOS: A personalized approach of neoadjuvant therapy, including INCB099280 monotherapy and bladder preservation, for muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma (MIBC) with ctDNA monitoring
Presenter: Valentina Tateo
Session: Poster session 13