Abstract 1606P
Background
Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) rarely with efficacy in mCRPC. EBRT may help; PSMA targeted radionucleotides deliver radiation to multiple sites, alpha emitters cause double-stranded DNA breaks which may be immunogenic. ARI may increase PSMA and PD-L1 + radiosensitze. We hypothesize that alpha-PSMA (225Ac-J591) leads to release of neoantigens and improves response to ICI.
Methods
Eligibility: Progressive mCRPC by PCWG3 criteria (at least one prior ARPI, no chemotherapy in the mCRPC setting). Treatment: ARI of physician’s choice (enza/apa/darolutamide), pembro (pembro 400mg every 6 weeks), and single infusion of 225Ac-J591 at two different dose levels (65 or 80 KBq/kg). Primary endpoint; determination of recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Clinical parameters including PSA decline, PFS, OS, and PSMA-PET/CT were analyzed.
Results
Two cohorts: 6 at 65 KBq/kg, 6 at 80 KBq/kg, all with at least 1 prior ARPI (58% prior abi, 58% enza, 8% apa; 17% abi + ARI), 42% sip-T, 17% 177Lu-PSMA. Median age 66.5, median PSA 7.75 ng/mL, 2 (17%) CALGB poor risk, 6 (50%) intermediate; 11 (92%) with bone metastases. With pembro, 7 (58%) received enza 3 (25%) apa, and 2 (17%) daro. No pt with MSI or high TMB (3 with germline BRCA2/CHEK2). No dose-limiting toxicity occurred and the RP2D was determined to be 80 KBq/Kg. A possibly delayed cytokine release syndrome of transient fever, thrombocytopenia, rash, and/or transaminitis occurred approx. 10 days after treatment in 58%. All patients had PSA decline, with 33% treated with 65 KBq/kg having >50% PSA decline and 67% in the 80 KBq/Kg group. All pts in the 65 KBq/kg group had progression (median PFS 5.4 months), whereas 50% in the 80 KBq/kg group completed 2 years of pembro and remain without progression. Median overall survival was 24 months in the 65 KBq/kg group, while 5 patients (83%) in the 80 KBq/kg group remain alive. Baseline median SUVmax whole body was 48.7 (55.5 in 66 KBq, 31.5 in 80 KBq) and the median SUVmean was 8.6 (similar in both groups).
Conclusions
The addition of 225Ac-J591 to pembro and ARI appears promising, with half of patients at 80 KBq/kg having durable response. The randomized phase II trial of pembro/ARI +/- 225Ac-J591 is ongoing (NCT04946370).
Clinical trial identification
NCT04946370.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Scott T. Tagawa, Weill Cornell Medicine.
Funding
Weill Cornell Medicine, US Department of Defense, Merck.
Disclosure
D.M. Nanus: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: tELIX; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Janssen Oncology; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, DSMB Member: Genentech Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI, PI clinical trial: Exelixis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI, Site lead clinical trial: Zenith Epigenetics. N.H. Bander: Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role: Convergent Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Personal, Licencing Fees or royalty for IP: Telix. S.T. Tagawa: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Convergent Therapeutics, AIkido Pharma; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consultant: Ambrx, Telix Pharma, Blue Earth Diagnostics, POINT Biopharma, Myovant, Bayer, 4D Pharma, Gilead, Pfizer, Janssen, Astellas, AbbVie, Novartis, Seagen, Clarity, Merck, EMD Serono, Regeneron, Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, DSMB: Boston Scientific; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: AIkido Pharma; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Patent co-inventor: Gilead; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board, Patent: Convergent Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Patent: Convergent Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: Medivation, Astellas, Janssen, Amgen, BMS, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Merck, Clovis, Seagen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Steering Committee Member: Gilead, Novartis, POINT Biopharma, Clarity, Ambrx, Promontory, Telix. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1553P - Access to EMA approved drugs in Europe, disparities across a border
Presenter: Orla Fitzpatrick
Session: Poster session 10
1554P - Co payments in cancer patients: Analysis and estimating OOP
Presenter: Krishnamani Kalpathi
Session: Poster session 10
1555P - Estimating the social value of immuno-oncology (IO) therapies in Japan
Presenter: Tomoya Ohno
Session: Poster session 10
1556P - Current landscape of drug approvals for genitourinary (GU) cancers in North America and Europe
Presenter: Jose Tapia
Session: Poster session 10
1557P - The use of patient experience in UK NICE decision making in oncology
Presenter: Noemi Muszbek
Session: Poster session 10
1558P - Independent validation of the Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (Gail model) for predicting breast cancer risk in Egyptian population
Presenter: Elaria Yacoub
Session: Poster session 10
1559P - Equity of access and clinical impact of genomic testing in patients with cancer in a UK early phase clinical trials unit
Presenter: Jonathan Poon
Session: Poster session 10
1560P - Optimal age versus real age in breast and gynaecological risk reducing surgery in BRCA1/2 carriers
Presenter: Alberta Ferrari
Session: Poster session 10
1561P - Targeted screening methodologies to select high risk individuals: LungFlag performance in Estonia Lung Cancer Screening Pilot
Presenter: Tanel Laisaar
Session: Poster session 10
1562P - The feasibility of polygenic risk score-based population screening for breast cancer: The experience from the BRIGHT study in Estonia
Presenter: Anni Lepland
Session: Poster session 10