Abstract 106P
Background
REM trial is an ongoing translational, prospective multicentre study exploring the role of plasma and tissue genotyping in EGFR-mutated advanced (a) NSCLC patients (pts) during treatment with Osi according to clinical practice. We present preliminary results concerning molecular characterization in plasma focusing on pts experiencing early progression on first-line Osi.
Methods
Pts with EGFR-mutated aNSCLC are prospectively enrolled. Liquid biopsy is performed at the time of Osi start (T0), after 10 (T1) and 28 days (T2), and upon radiological or clinical progression (PD) (T3). Plasmatic EGFR mutations are tested at each timepoint using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Clearance at specific timepoints is defined as the absence of detectable plasmatic EGFR mutant cfDNA. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) with 77-gene panel is performed at T0 and T3. EPD was defined as PD within 9 months (m) since the start of Osi.
Results
We present preliminary analyses on the first 74 enrolled pts. After a median follow-up of 7.4 m (95%CI 9.0-13.0), objective response rate was 66% (95%CI 53%-77%) and 13 pts (17%) experienced EPD. No clinical feature was associated with the risk of EPD. Clearance of cfDNA was observed at T1 in 37 pts (56%) and at T2 in 48 pts (77%). Lack of clearance at T1 and T2 was associated with higher probability of experiencing EPD (p=0.04, p=0.02), while baseline EGFR positivity in plasma was not. Results of T0 NGS was available for 49 pts (64%). The most prevalent co-mutations (mut) identified were TP53 (N=19, 38%) and PIK3CA (N=7, 14%) mut. Baseline TP53 co-mut significantly increased the risk for EPD (p=0.002). Pts with a basal p53 co-mut experienced significantly worse progression-free survival (HR 3.82, 95%CI 1.27-11.4, p=0.017) and overall survival (HR 8.69, 95%CI 2.06-36.7, p=0.031).
Conclusions
Our preliminary data confirm feasibility of longitudinal characterization in plasma in clinical practice. Clearance of EGFR mut after 10 days since Osi start and TP53 co-mut were able to identify pts at risk for EPD. Data warrant validation for use in clinical practice decision making.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Università degli Studi di Padova.
Funding
AstraZeneca.
Disclosure
L. Bonanno: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, MSD, BMS, Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, MSD, BMS, Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Lilly; Financial Interests, Institutional, Steering Committee Member: AstraZeneca; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator: Roche, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, BMS, Janssen, PharmaMar, Arcus Biosciences. L. Calvetti: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, MSD, Roche. A. Pavan: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, MSD, BMS. A. Dal Maso: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, MSD. S. Frega: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: MSD. G. Pasello: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Amgen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, MSD, Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Roche, Janssen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, unconditioned support: AstraZeneca, MSD; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator: AstraZeneca, Roche, Novartis, Lilly, Janssen, PharmaMar. V. Guarneri: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Eli Lilly, Novartis, GSK, AstraZeneca, Gilead, Exact Sciences; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Eli Lilly, Novartis, MSD, Gilead, Eli Lilly, Merck serono, Exact Sciences, Eisai, Olema Oncology, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: Eli Lilly, Roche, BMS, Novartis, AstraZeneca, MSD, Synton Biopharmaceuticals, Merck, GSK, Daiichi Sankyo, Nerviano, Pfizer; Non-Financial Interests, Member: ASCO. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
153P - 23ME-01473, an Fc-enhanced anti-ULBP6/2/5 antibody, restores anti-tumor NK cell function through NKG2D and FcgRIIIa activation
Presenter: Kim Gerrick
Session: Poster session 08
154P - Phase II study of nivolumab and relatlimab utilizing single cell analysis of circulating T cells reveals immune features associated with response to dual PD-1 and LAG-3 inhibition
Presenter: James Dollar
Session: Poster session 08
155P - The molecular basis of the lymphocyte stability index (LSI): A pan-cancer peripheral biomarker for survival post immune checkpoint blockade (ICB)
Presenter: Robert Watson
Session: Poster session 08
156P - Microbiota-related multiomics to assess the clinical relevance of antibiotics (ATB) in immunotherapy (ICI)
Presenter: Adele Bonato
Session: Poster session 08
157P - Soluble and EV-bound CD27 act as antagonistic biomarkers in patients with solid tumors undergoing immunotherapy
Presenter: Joao Gorgulho
Session: Poster session 08
158P - Patterns of immune-related adverse events in early-phase cancer immunotherapy trials
Presenter: Benjamin Fairfax
Session: Poster session 08
160P - Predicting immune-related adverse events using biomarkers in early-phase cancer immunotherapy trials
Presenter: Benjamin Fairfax
Session: Poster session 08
161P - Fibroblast activation protein (FAP)-CD40 (RO7300490) mediates intratumoral DC maturation and modulation of the tumor microenvironment
Presenter: Ignacio Melero
Session: Poster session 08
162P - Exploiting gp100-specific antibodies isolated from immune checkpoint inhibitor-responsive melanoma patients to target tumor cells
Presenter: Lukas Flatz
Session: Poster session 08