Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 14

277P - Long term follow-up of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without anthracyclines in the presence of trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 14

Presenters

Jinmei Zhou

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S309-S348. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1577

Authors

J. Zhou, J. Xiao, X. Wu, X. wang, H. Zhang, S. Zhang, L. Bian, Z. Jiang, T. Wang

Author affiliations

  • Breast Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital/No.307 Chinese PLA Hospital - South Campus, 100071 - Beijing/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 277P

Background

Because Pertuzumab hasn't been approved in China until 2020y, trastuzumab has been standard neoadjuvant treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer. But we don't know which is the optimal chemotherapy in the trastuzumab-based HER2-blockade. We designed this clinical trial to compare efficacy and safety between anthracycline and carboplatin in combination with docetaxel and trastuzumab as neoadjuvant therapy. Now we reported the long-term follow-up data.

Methods

From Apr, 2013 to Apr, 2019, 128 patients were enrolled. 63 patients were randomly assigned to the ATH-TH (doxorubicin/docetaxel/trastuzumab) group and 65 to the TCH (docetaxel/carboplatin/trastuzumab)group. The treatment plan is showed as following, 1. TCH group: Trastuzumab combined with carboplatin and docetaxel, total 6 cycles; 2. ATH-TH group: Trastuzumab combined with doxorubicin and docetaxel 4 cycles, followed by Trastuzumab plus docetaxel 4 cycles. Primary endpoint was pCR (ypT0/is/ypN0). Second endpoints included safety, event-free and overall survial (EFS and OS).

Results

Baseline Patients' characteristics were well balanced between ATH-TH group and TCH group: median age 50y/48y, hormone receptor positive 44.4% vs 46.2%, Ⅰ-ⅢA stage 79.4% VS 86.2%, IIIB-IIIC stage 20.6% VS 13.8%. The pCR rate was no significant difference (P=0.592) in ATH-TH 54.0% (95% CI:41.3%-66.6%) and TCH group 49.2% (95% CI :36.7%-61.7%). Seven-year EFS estimates were 85.6% for ATH-TH and 88.4% for TCH (p=0.767, HR=1.17, 95% CI: 0.42-3.21). Seven-year OS estimates were 94.4% for ATH-TH and 94.4%for TCH (p=0.691, HR=1.35, 95% CI: 0.31-5.90). Patients who achieved a pCR had improved EFS (p<0.001) and OS (p=0.003) compared with those who did not. The most common adverse events were hematologic toxicities. ATH-TH group had higher 3/4 grade leukocyte decrease rates than TCH group (91.9% VS 44.6%, p<0.001), ATH-TH group had more FN than (32.8% VS 3.1%, p<0.001).

Conclusions

This is the first prospective randomised trial comparing neoadjuvant therapy regimen ATH-TH with TCH in HER2-positive breast cancer of pCR and long-term survival data. We acquired similar pCR rate, seven-year EFS and OS but less toxicity in TCH group compared with ATH-TH.

Clinical trial identification

NCT02510781.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital.

Funding

Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.