Abstract 1588P
Background
HZ infection is a potential cause of additional morbidity in immunocompromised patients (pts). ASCO, ESMO, and AIOM recommend recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV, Shingrix®, GSK) for pts who are immunocompromised due to cancer therapy. Vaccination rates among these pts remain suboptimal, and research on effective interventions to improve vaccination rates is limited. We report quality improvement interventions aimed at enhancing vaccine uptake among cancer outpatients.
Methods
A two-phase vaccination program for cancer outpatients receiving cancer treatments attending the Medical Oncology department of ASST Rhodense was conducted. Firstly, based on previous COVID-19 experience and with the collaboration of pts asociation La Lampada di Aladino ETS, a cross-sectional survey was administered to evaluate knowledge and awareness about HZ and RZV, vaccine hesitancy and the willingness of oncology pts to receive the RZV directly in the oncology department. Subsequently, an in-house vaccination program was managed by oncology staff.
Results
Two hundred pts conducted the survey while undergoing cancer treatment, highlighting partial understanding of HZ and RZV and a huge willingness to receive RZV from oncological staff. From June 2023 to April 2024, 220 pts received at least 1 dose of RZV, among which 152 (69%) received the second dose, resulting in a vaccination rate of 44% (220/496). Pts characteristics were as follows: 57% female, median age 70 (43-93) years, 80% ECOG PS 0-1, and 39% with at least 3 comorbidities. The most frequent tumors were breast 29%, lung 18%, colorectal 14%, prostate 10%, and upper GI 6%. The most common anticancer treatments were chemotherapy 44%, immunotherapy 28% targeted therapy 23%, and endocrine therapy 5%. No severe adverse event to RZV were reported. RZV was administered on average 7 (0-51) days before and 8 (0-70) days after intravenous therapy respectively.
Conclusions
Most cancer pts have a limited perception of the importance of vaccination. Vaccination with RZV was found to be safe. Our study highlights the potential for in-hospital vaccination strategies to enhance vaccination coverage and improve health outcomes among oncology pts.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
GSK.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1553P - Access to EMA approved drugs in Europe, disparities across a border
Presenter: Orla Fitzpatrick
Session: Poster session 10
1554P - Co payments in cancer patients: Analysis and estimating OOP
Presenter: Krishnamani Kalpathi
Session: Poster session 10
1555P - Estimating the social value of immuno-oncology (IO) therapies in Japan
Presenter: Tomoya Ohno
Session: Poster session 10
1556P - Current landscape of drug approvals for genitourinary (GU) cancers in North America and Europe
Presenter: Jose Tapia
Session: Poster session 10
1557P - The use of patient experience in UK NICE decision making in oncology
Presenter: Noemi Muszbek
Session: Poster session 10
1558P - Independent validation of the Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (Gail model) for predicting breast cancer risk in Egyptian population
Presenter: Elaria Yacoub
Session: Poster session 10
1559P - Equity of access and clinical impact of genomic testing in patients with cancer in a UK early phase clinical trials unit
Presenter: Jonathan Poon
Session: Poster session 10
1560P - Optimal age versus real age in breast and gynaecological risk reducing surgery in BRCA1/2 carriers
Presenter: Alberta Ferrari
Session: Poster session 10
1561P - Targeted screening methodologies to select high risk individuals: LungFlag performance in Estonia Lung Cancer Screening Pilot
Presenter: Tanel Laisaar
Session: Poster session 10
1562P - The feasibility of polygenic risk score-based population screening for breast cancer: The experience from the BRIGHT study in Estonia
Presenter: Anni Lepland
Session: Poster session 10