Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 11

1715P - Interim analysis results from a phase II study of adjuvant penpulimab in very high-risk clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 11

Topics

Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Renal Cell Cancer

Presenters

Xu Zhang

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S1012-S1030. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1609

Authors

X. Zhang, L. Gu, H. Zhao, C. Peng, Q. Huang, X. Ma

Author affiliations

  • Department Of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital (301Hospital), 100000 - Beijing/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1715P

Background

The keynote-564 study showed that adjuvant pembrolizumab improved disease-free survival (DFS) in high-risk clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) patients. However, subgroup analysis showed that not all patients benefited. Hence, we aim to explore the efficacy and safety of penpulimab after nephrectomy in ccRCC with a very high-risk of recurrence.

Methods

In this prospective, standard of care-controlled, phase Ⅱ trial, eligible ccRCC patients were aged 18-80 years with a very high-risk (pT3aG1-G2 and ≥2 pT3a factors, pT3aG3-G4, pT3b or higher, regional lymph-node metastasis, or stage M1 with NED) of recurrence who after surgery, without prior targeted therapy or immunotherapy, and ECOG PS of 0 or 1. Patients received penpulimab 200 mg intravenously on day 1 every 3 weeks until progression, intolerable toxicities, or completion of 17 cycles, or observation after surgery. Primary endpoint was DFS. Secondary endpoints included overall survival and safety.

Results

Between July 2022 and March 2024, 63 patients were enrolled to receive penpulimab (n=31) or observation (n=32). Most patients in the penpulimab group had M1 NED status (19.4%) than the control group (3.1%). The group of individuals who were treated with penpulimab had a higher risk than the control group (P=0.040). At data cutoff of April 25, 2024, median follow-up for the penpulimab and control groups were 8.3m (95% CI: 5.1-11.5) and 5.7m (95% CI: 2.8-8.6), respectively. During follow-up, 2 and 5 patients had recurrence respectively. mDFS was not reached in the penpulimab group, and 11.2m in the control group (HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.04-1.16). The 7-month DFS rate in the penpulimab and control group were 89.3% and 82.1%, respectively. There was a beneficial trend in the penpulimab group. In the penpulimab group, the TRAE was 93.6% (29/31), mainly Grade 1-2, without Grade 3 and only 1 case of Grade 4, which was immune-related myositis. Most common TRAEs were proteinuria (35.48%), rash (32.26%), alanine aminotransferase increased (19.35%). No treatment-related death was observed.

Conclusions

Adjuvant penpulimab demonstrated promising antitumor activity and manageable safety profile in ccRCC with a very high-risk of recurrence.

Clinical trial identification

ChiCTR2200062189.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Chinese PLA General Hospital.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.