Abstract 1745P
Background
Approximately 30-40% will develop distant metastasis and will eventually succumb to the disease. Beyond first-line, disease control is modest, with median progression-free survival (PFS) ranging 2.6–4.6 months The value of trabectedin (T) has been emphasized beyond the first line in the treatment of metastatic soft tissue sarcomas. There are data of T + Radiotherapy (RT) in combination,30Gy in 10 sessions.
Methods
Retrospective review of patients' medical records who have received trabectedin in the last 5 years. Descriptive analysis has been conducted. In a subsequent step, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. A specific analysis was conducted on the subgroup that received a combination with RT.
Results
We analyzed 207 patients, with a predominance of women 116 (56%) and 91 men. 73 pts get treatment at second line (2L), and 75 pts get trabectedin in third line (3L). PFS in all patients is around 6 months influence due to time patients get treatment. PFS in pts treated at 2L 14 month, 6 month as 3L, and lower in subsequences lines. P=0,001. OS (43m vs 41) p=no significance. Leiomyosarcoma (Lei) and liposarcoma (Lipo) exhibit the best PFS compared to the others, with statistical significance. A lesser response to trabectedin was observed in those presenting with metastatic disease at onset (PFS 6m (M1) vs 9 (M0)) There was no objective worsening in PFS for patients who experienced dose reduction or delayed administration. 80 pts were treated with RT, most patients were Lei (24), Lipo (20), synovial sarcoma (8), UPS (7), pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma (5) and stromal sarcoma (3). PFS in those receiving concurrent RT(9m) versus those who did not (5m) p=0,086. Disease control rate in irradiated lesion was 89%, with a better response in Lei and synovial sarcomas.
Conclusions
All patients treated showed benefit with PFS 6 month, higher than literature review. There are significant differences with a higher PFS in patient with lower number of previous lines. There are various factors that influence the response, such as metastatic presentation, metastasis location, histological subtype, and RT. RT provides adequate disease control, with improvement in the survival of these patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1372P - Advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma in the era of immunotherapy: Survival and the risk of multiple primary malignancies
Presenter: Nahla Ali
Session: Poster session 06
1373P - Measuring PFS in clinical trials and observational studies of patients with NSCLC: A scoping review
Presenter: Marjon Verschueren
Session: Poster session 06
1374P - Analysis of evolution of patient reported side effects during treatment for advanced NSCLC
Presenter: Helena Linardou
Session: Poster session 06
1375P - Sequential ctDNA profiling in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: An interim analysis of the COPE randomized study
Presenter: Antoine Italiano
Session: Poster session 06
Resources:
Abstract
1376P - Early detection of disease progression in NSCLC patients undergoing immunotherapy through ctDNA analysis
Presenter: Virginia Calvo de Juan
Session: Poster session 06
1377P - Association of anatomic proximity of brain parenchymal metastasis to the CSF space and upfront stereotactic radiosurgery to subsequent leptomeningeal metastasis development in brain metastatic NSCLC
Presenter: Shoaib Bashir
Session: Poster session 06
Resources:
Abstract
1378P - Improvements in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer survival differ by race in the US
Presenter: Oluwaseun Ayoade
Session: Poster session 06
1379P - c-Met protein overexpression and telisotuzumab vedotin efficacy by biopsy age, type, and region in the LUMINOSITY phase II study
Presenter: Jair Bar
Session: Poster session 06
1380P - PK/PD analysis of pembrolizumab, nivolumab and atezolizumab in NSCLC patients: The PIONeeR trial
Presenter: Joseph Ciccolini
Session: Poster session 06
1381P - Comparison between standard dose 75mg/m<sup>2</sup> and fixed dose at 50mg of cisplatin in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer patients in term of response rate and toxicity profile
Presenter: Maher Salamoon
Session: Poster session 06