Abstract 1111P
Background
Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) has greatly improved the prognosis of advanced melanoma. However, the efficacy of ICI in Japanese patients has been found to be lower than Caucasian. It is thought that one of the causes is that acral and mucosal melanoma have a low tumour mutation burden and driver mutations such as BRAF. However, there is no report performing the genomic and transcriptomic analysis in Japanese patients. By analysing the Japanese patients with melanoma, we aimed to clarify how they differ from Caucasians. Furthermore, we challenged to explore biomarkers for the efficacy of ICI.
Methods
The blood and tumor samples were collected from the patients before and after ICI therapy at multiple facilities. Based on the clinical information, the genomic and transcriptomic analysis were performed. In particular, ICI responder and non-responder genomes were analyzed separately.
Results
In this analysis, 129 tumor samples from 78 cases were collected, and 112 tumors and 65 cases were analyzed. Somatic mutations in Japanese patients are significantly different from those in Caucasians. That is, there were few mutations such as single nucleotide variant and single base substitution, and the majority were triple wild type tumours without driver mutations such as BRAF. While the presence of these mutations is associated with treatment response in the Caucasian patients, the involvement of these mutations was found to be less significant in Japanese patients. In this context, we compared the gene expressions of responder and non-responder tumours and found differences in genes such as HLA-A24, follicular helper T cells, and MARCO. We considered that these genes might be potential biomarkers in Japanese melanoma.
Conclusions
This is the first and largest study in Japan in which tumour samples were prospectively analysed before and after ICI treatment for melanoma. Further studies focusing on these biomarkers are desirable.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1091P - Neoadjuvant cemiplimab for stage II–IV cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC): 2-year follow-up and biomarker analyses
Presenter: Danny Rischin
Session: Poster session 04
1092P - Nivolumab plus relatlimab vs nivolumab in previously untreated metastatic or unresectable melanoma: 3-year subgroup analyses from RELATIVITY-047
Presenter: Dirk Schadendorf
Session: Poster session 04
1093P - Preliminary biomarker analysis in the phase III PIVOTAL study: Evidence for the mechanism of action of daromun in melanoma
Presenter: Paolo Ascierto
Session: Poster session 04
1094P - NeoRisk: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NeoIT) recurrence risk assessment tool
Presenter: Ines Pires da Silva
Session: Poster session 04
1095P - Pembrolizumab versus placebo after a complete resection of high-risk stage III melanoma: 7-year results of the EORTC 1325-MG/Keynote-054 double-blind phase III trial
Presenter: Alexander Eggermont
Session: Poster session 04
1096P - Camrelizumab plus apatinib in patients with advanced mucosal melanoma: A 3-year survival update with biomarker analysis
Presenter: Zhengyun Zou
Session: Poster session 04
1098P - Mechanisms of recurrence following mRNA-4157 (V940) plus pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab alone in resected melanoma from the mRNA-4157-P201 (KEYNOTE-942) trial
Presenter: Ryan Sullivan
Session: Poster session 04
1099P - COMBI-EU: Adverse event management of adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib (D+T) in patients with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Peter Mohr
Session: Poster session 04
1100P - Anti-PD1 + low-dose anti-CTLA4 immunotherapy pathological response rate in patients with stage III resectable melanoma: Phase III NEOMIMAJOR trial interim analysis
Presenter: Igor Samoylenko
Session: Poster session 04