Abstract 1489P
Background
In light of the expanding utilization of electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) in healthcare settings, their integration into the standard practice of palliative care remains uncertain. This investigation aimed to identify the determinants linked with adherence to ePRO utilization within a Cancer Network in Brazil.
Methods
Eligible patients had metastatic solid cancer with an expected survival of over 3 months. They were enrolled in monthly ePRO assessments using the Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale (IPOS). Patients failing to complete assessments received one reminder. We conducted multivariate regression analyses to examine the factors influencing adherence. Patient characteristics (age, gender, marital status, education level, and cancer type), along with initial responses on the IPOS, were included as predictors. Follow-up time within palliative care was controlled for in the analysis.
Results
A total of 494 patients were included, with a median age of 67 years (range: 22-94). Most were female (56.1%), married (58.9%), and had at least high school education (77.7%). Most were diagnosed with gastrointestinal (33.2%), breast (20.2%), and genitourinary (14.8%) cancers. Patients had a median follow-up time within palliative care of 10.5 months (range: 3-63 months). Notably, younger age (β=-0.3, SE=0.01, p=0.004), female gender (β=-0.7, SE=0.36, p=0.03) and higher education (β =0.1, SE = 0.06, p = 0.009) were associated with higher ePRO adherence. Interestingly, lower initial assessment score was linked with increased ePRO adherence (p=0.002). Patients experiencing loss of appetite (β=0.4, SE=0.18, p=0.01), having an anxious family member (β=0.3, SE=0.16, p=0.03), and expressing a desire for more information (β=0.2, SE=0.11, p=0.04) also demonstrated higher ePRO adherence.
Conclusions
Our findings underscore the need for tailored approaches to promote patient engagement and improve adherence to ePRO assessments in palliative care settings. Further research exploring interventions targeted at addressing these factors could enhance the integration of ePRO into routine clinical practice, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes and quality of care.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1564P - Limited participation in breast cancer screening among low-SES women: A matter of engagement or of health literacy?
Presenter: Allegra Ferrari
Session: Poster session 10
1566P - Optimizing participation in lung cancer screening program: Results from the first round in ILYAD study in Lyon University Hospital
Presenter: Emmanuel Grolleau
Session: Poster session 10
1567P - Physicians' adenoma detection rate and the risk of colorectal cancer in sequential screening programs: An observational cohort study
Presenter: Li Xie
Session: Poster session 10
1568P - Challenges in pilot lung cancer screening in Vojvodina, Serbia
Presenter: Jelena Djekic Malbasa
Session: Poster session 10
1569P - Secondary delay in breast cancer diagnosis and role of rural medical practitioners: A cause and cure finding study
Presenter: Rahul Agarwal
Session: Poster session 10
1570P - Factors and impacts of delayed presentation for county-level patients with breast cancer in a real-life setting in China
Presenter: Yinghua Ji
Session: Poster session 10
1571P - The reasons that motivate a change of specialties among oncology residents
Presenter: Christophe Ducrocq
Session: Poster session 10
1572P - Factors associated with career choice in oncology among medical students
Presenter: Nicolas Penel
Session: Poster session 10
1573P - Global cancer statistics for adolescents and young adults: New estimates from GLOBOCAN 2022
Presenter: Wang-Zhong Li
Session: Poster session 10
Resources:
Abstract