Abstract 1570P
Background
New breast cancer (BC) cases in county regions, including rural areas, account for 33% of all BC cases annually in China. Women residing in county areas generally have lower economic income and educational levels compared to urban women, lacking the access to medical resources. We utilized real-world data to explore the factors and impacts of delayed presentation for BC patients (pts) in county areas.
Methods
CHASE001 (NCT05544123) was an observational, multicenter study assessing real-world treatment patterns among BC pts in county areas of China. Descriptive statistics reported patient intervals and demographics. Multivariate regression analyses (MVA) and rank-sum test were used to analyze factors and impacts associated with delayed presentation.
Results
This analysis included 2405 BC pts with pathological diagnosis from February 2001 to July 2023. The median time from symptom onset to the first presentation to a healthcare professional was 1.0 month (IQR 0.3-5.0). the proportion of delayed presentation (intervals≥3 months) was 28.4%. The median interval among pts with delayed presentation was 12.0 months (IQR 6.0, 24.0). MVA revealed that lower education levels (OR 1.37 [95% CI 1.13-1.67]; p=.002), lack of breast screening (OR 1.42 [95% CI 1.06-1.91]; p=.019), being farmers and unemployed (OR 1.36 [95% CI 1.01-1.83]; p=.045), and residing in county areas in western China (OR 1.71 [95% CI 1.38-2.12]; p<.001) were significantly associated with delayed presentation. The rank-sum test demonstrated that delayed presentation was linked with higher disease burden. The proportion of pts with delayed presentation diagnosed with stage III-IV (p<.001), tumor size≥2cm (p<.001), and more than three positive lymph nodes (p=.005) was significantly higher than those who sought timely care.
Conclusions
This analysis indicates that patient delays are influenced by social determinants of health. Lower socioeconomic status and education levels are risk factors for delayed presentation, and medical resources are unevenly distributed across regions. Therefore, promoting early presentation through advocacy, education, and policy should be prioritized, especially targeting socially deprived and less educated populations.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
AstraZeneca.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1553P - Access to EMA approved drugs in Europe, disparities across a border
Presenter: Orla Fitzpatrick
Session: Poster session 10
1554P - Co payments in cancer patients: Analysis and estimating OOP
Presenter: Krishnamani Kalpathi
Session: Poster session 10
1555P - Estimating the social value of immuno-oncology (IO) therapies in Japan
Presenter: Tomoya Ohno
Session: Poster session 10
1556P - Current landscape of drug approvals for genitourinary (GU) cancers in North America and Europe
Presenter: Jose Tapia
Session: Poster session 10
1557P - The use of patient experience in UK NICE decision making in oncology
Presenter: Noemi Muszbek
Session: Poster session 10
1558P - Independent validation of the Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (Gail model) for predicting breast cancer risk in Egyptian population
Presenter: Elaria Yacoub
Session: Poster session 10
1559P - Equity of access and clinical impact of genomic testing in patients with cancer in a UK early phase clinical trials unit
Presenter: Jonathan Poon
Session: Poster session 10
1560P - Optimal age versus real age in breast and gynaecological risk reducing surgery in BRCA1/2 carriers
Presenter: Alberta Ferrari
Session: Poster session 10
1561P - Targeted screening methodologies to select high risk individuals: LungFlag performance in Estonia Lung Cancer Screening Pilot
Presenter: Tanel Laisaar
Session: Poster session 10
1562P - The feasibility of polygenic risk score-based population screening for breast cancer: The experience from the BRIGHT study in Estonia
Presenter: Anni Lepland
Session: Poster session 10