Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 15

401P - Evaluation of HER2 scoring in breast carcinoma-stained whole slide images

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 15

Topics

Tumour Site

Breast Cancer

Presenters

Céline Bossard

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S357-S405. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1579

Authors

C. Bossard1, Y. Salhi2, T. Florian3, B. Poulet4, B. Cormier5, S. Salhi2, E. Guinaudeau6, L. Lambros6, I. Chokri5, F. Jossic7, J. Chetritt6

Author affiliations

  • 1 Pathology, IHP Group - Centre de dépistage et de diagnostic du cancer – Anatomie et cytologie pathologique, 44104 - Nantes/FR
  • 2 Ceo, DiaDeep, 69003 - Lyon/FR
  • 3 R&d, DiaDeep, 69003 - Lyon/FR
  • 4 Pathology, IHP Group - Institut d'Histo-Pathologie, 92240 - Malakoff/FR
  • 5 Pathology, IHP Group - Institut d'Histo-Pathologie, 37170 - Chambray-lès-Tours/FR
  • 6 Pathology, IHP Group - Institut d'Histo-Pathologie Nantes, 44104 - Nantes/FR
  • 7 Pathology, IHP, 49130 - Angers/FR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 401P

Background

Accurate HER2 status assessment is crucial in clinical decision-making. Moreover, scores 1+ and 2+ not amplified have been shown to benefit from treatment with the new HER2-based antibody-drug conjugates. In this context, we developed an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for automatic, precise and replicable quantification of HER2 protein overexpression, assisting pathologists in HER2 scoring.

Methods

We developed a fully-automated AI software for assisting pathologists in HER2 scoring. The proposed algorithm automatically detects invasive regions of the tumor and quantifies the tumor cells in these regions. It also characterizes each cell according to its membrane completeness and intensity and provides pathologists a readily interpretable score along with the details of the slide analysis, in accordance with the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines. Three breast expert pathologists scored a hold-out dataset of 70 WSI. After a washout period of two months, they re-scored these WSI with AI assistance. The performances of the model are evaluated by comparing the inter-observer agreement rate with and without AI, and by comparing the model results with the pathologists ground truth.

Results

The model demonstrated an overall balanced accuracy of 90.3% on the validation dataset. The overall inter-observer agreement (Fleiss Kappa) significantly improved, going from 37% without A.I to 64% with AI assistance. The AI-based software achieved an accuracy of 98% in correctly scoring HER2-low carcinomas.

Conclusions

The proposed fully-automated solution could perform exhaustive tumor cell analysis in invasive tissue, without requiring any pathologist intervention. Moreover, such a solution could help to standardize the routine results between pathologists which can suffer from an important variability, thus improving the targeted therapeutic decision.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

DiaDeep.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.