Abstract 1555P
Background
Approved for 17 cancers in Japan, use of IO therapy has steadily increased since 2014. For four IO therapies (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, and durvalumab), we modeled life years saved (LYS), the social value of those LYS, and how that value distributes across manufacturers and society for six, high-burden, advanced/recurrent cancers (non-small cell lung cancer, renal, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, gastric, urothelial, and endometrial) in Japan.
Methods
A model of IO therapy treatment for six cancers estimated LYS and their monetized value. Per-person survival gains were estimated using digitized overall survival curves relative to a prior treatment standard reported by landmark clinical trials supporting IO therapy approval for each cancer. These per-person gains were scaled to the Japanese population using data from a nationally representative hospital treatment database and monetized to total social value using published estimates of the value of a statistical life year based upon human capital and willingness to pay approaches. Manufacturer and societal shares using time-varying drug and administrative costs were calculated. A 5-year timeframe beginning Jan 1, 2017, comprised our base-case. The impact of analytic timeframe, rates of IO therapy utilization, time on treatment, and treatment efficacy were explored in univariate sensitivity analyses.
Results
The base-case indicated the four IO therapies resulted in 8,851 LYS among patients with the six modeled cancers for a net social value of ¥244B (benefit less treatment costs) of which 86.5% (¥211B) was classified as social surplus (share of value to patients and other parts of society) versus 13.5% (¥33B) to manufacturers (manufacturer share). Estimates were most sensitive to analytic timeframe. Over a 10-year timeframe, an additional 28,715 patients would receive IO therapy for these cancers resulting in 17,863 additional LYS for a ¥509B increase in net social value. While ¥94B additional treatment costs are incurred, the manufacturer share of social value decreased to 4.9%.
Conclusions
In Japan among six high-burden cancers, treatment with four IO therapies has generated substantial social value, and the societal share of that value has increased over time and with increased therapy use.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1564P - Limited participation in breast cancer screening among low-SES women: A matter of engagement or of health literacy?
Presenter: Allegra Ferrari
Session: Poster session 10
1566P - Optimizing participation in lung cancer screening program: Results from the first round in ILYAD study in Lyon University Hospital
Presenter: Emmanuel Grolleau
Session: Poster session 10
1567P - Physicians' adenoma detection rate and the risk of colorectal cancer in sequential screening programs: An observational cohort study
Presenter: Li Xie
Session: Poster session 10
1568P - Challenges in pilot lung cancer screening in Vojvodina, Serbia
Presenter: Jelena Djekic Malbasa
Session: Poster session 10
1569P - Secondary delay in breast cancer diagnosis and role of rural medical practitioners: A cause and cure finding study
Presenter: Rahul Agarwal
Session: Poster session 10
1570P - Factors and impacts of delayed presentation for county-level patients with breast cancer in a real-life setting in China
Presenter: Yinghua Ji
Session: Poster session 10
1571P - The reasons that motivate a change of specialties among oncology residents
Presenter: Christophe Ducrocq
Session: Poster session 10
1572P - Factors associated with career choice in oncology among medical students
Presenter: Nicolas Penel
Session: Poster session 10
1573P - Global cancer statistics for adolescents and young adults: New estimates from GLOBOCAN 2022
Presenter: Wang-Zhong Li
Session: Poster session 10
Resources:
Abstract