Abstract 1718O
Background
REGO is a multikinase inhibitor showing efficacy as salvage treatment in non-adipocytic ASTS (Mir et al. Lancet Oncol. 2016). We explore here the role of REGO as maintenance therapy after 1st line treatment.
Methods
EREMISS (NCT03793361) was a double-blind, PBO-controlled, comparative, randomised phase 2 trial assessing the activity and safety of REGO (120 mg/d, 3 weeks / 4) in pts with non-adipocytic ASTS, who had stable disease (SD) or partial tumour response (PR) after 6 cycles of doxorubicin-based chemotherapy as 1st line treatment. There was no planned cross-over. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) according to RECIST 1.1 evaluated by blinded independent, central review (BICR). Based on the following assumptions: PFS(PBO)=4 mo, expected PFS(REGO)=7 mo, HR=0.57, 1-sided α=.05 and β=.10, 110 events (PD), 126 pts were required (see 1731TiP, ESMO 2019).
Results
The study population consisted of 126 pts (PBO: 62, REGO: 64) enrolled in 17 centres from May 2019 to Nov 2022, 55% female, median age=58 years (range, 18-85). The most common subtype was leiomyosarcoma (59%). All pts had previously received 6 cycles of doxorubicin-based chemotherapy (+ DTIC in 24%, IFO in 14%); PR in 30%, SD in 70%. Median follow-up was 27 mo. Median duration of treatment was 3.4 (PBO) vs 4.3 mo (REGO). The primary objective was assessable in 122 pts (109 events). Median PFS by BICR was 3.5 (PBO) vs 5.6 mo (REGO) (HR=0.51; p=.001). According to investigator assessment, median PFS was 3.6 vs 6.8 mo (HR=0.56, p=.002). Median OS was 21.0 vs 27.6 mo (HR=0.82; p=.41). The rate of Gr≥3 AEs was 11% (PBO) vs 66% (REGO). Toxicity led to permanent treatment discontinuation in 18/64 REGO pts (28%), 0/62 PBO. The most common Gr≥3 clinical AEs in REGO arm were asthenia (9%), arterial hypertension (8%) and rash (8%).
Conclusions
This trial met its primary objective, REGO significantly delays disease progression after doxorubicin-based 1st line treatment in ASTS. This was associated with a non-significant trend of OS improvement. This benefit must be balanced with the occurrence of AEs.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03793361 May 15, 2019.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Centre Oscar Lambret.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1719O - Multisarc: A randomized precision medicine study in advanced soft-tissue sarcomas
Presenter: Benjamin Verret
Session: Proffered paper session: Sarcoma
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
Invited Discussant 1718O and 1719O
Presenter: Claudia María Valverde Morales
Session: Proffered paper session: Sarcoma
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Q&A
Session: Proffered paper session: Sarcoma
Resources:
Webcast
LBA78 - Updated efficacy and safety of vimseltinib in patients (pts) with tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT): One-year follow-up from the MOTION phase III trial
Presenter: Hans Gelderblom
Session: Proffered paper session: Sarcoma
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
LBA79 - LENVAGIST: A multicentre, comparative, placebo (P)-controlled, double-blinded, phase II study of the efficacy of Lenvatinib (L) in patients with advanced GIST after failure of imatinib and sunitinib
Presenter: Jean-Yves Blay
Session: Proffered paper session: Sarcoma
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
Invited Discussant LBA78 and LBA79
Presenter: Tom Wei-Wu Chen
Session: Proffered paper session: Sarcoma
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Q&A
Session: Proffered paper session: Sarcoma
Resources:
Webcast