Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Proffered paper session: Sarcoma

1718O - EREMISS trial: A double-blind placebo (PBO)-controlled randomised trial assessing efficacy/safety of regorafenib (REGO) as maintenance therapy after 1st line doxorubicin-based chemotherapy in advanced soft-tissue sarcoma (ASTS) patients (pts)

Date

16 Sep 2024

Session

Proffered paper session: Sarcoma

Topics

Clinical Research

Tumour Site

Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Presenters

Nicolas Penel

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S1031-S1061. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1610

Authors

N. Penel1, A. Italiano2, J. Wallet3, L. Chaigneau4, B. Verret5, N. Firmin6, S. Watson7, T. Valentin8, E. Bompas9, F. Bertucci10, M. Brahmi11, A. Le Cesne12, A. Brunot13, M. Spalato Ceruso14, M. Vanseymortier3, E. Decoupigny3, S. Taieb15, M. Le Deley3, C. Perrin13, J. Blay16

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, 59020 - Lille/FR
  • 2 Early Phase Trials Unit, Institute Bergonié - Centre Régional de Lutte Contre le Cancer (CLCC), 33000 - Bordeaux/FR
  • 3 Clinical Research Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, 59020 - Lille/FR
  • 4 Oncology, CHRU Besancon - Hopital Jean Minjoz, 25030 - Besancon/FR
  • 5 Medical Oncology Department, Institut Gustave Roussy, 94805 - Villejuif/FR
  • 6 Medical Oncology, ICM Val D Aurelle, 34090 - Montpellier/FR
  • 7 Medical Oncology And Inserm U830, Institut Curie, 75005 - Paris/FR
  • 8 Medical Oncology Department, Institut Universitaire du Cancer -Toulouse- Oncopole, 31059 - Toulouse/FR
  • 9 Oncology Dept., ICO Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest René Gauducheau, 44805 - Saint-Herblain/FR
  • 10 Medical Oncology, IPC - Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009 - Marseille/FR
  • 11 Medical Oncology Dept., Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 - Lyon/FR
  • 12 Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, 94805 - Villejuif/FR
  • 13 Medical Oncology, Centre Eugene - Marquis, 35042 - Rennes/FR
  • 14 Medical Oncology Department, Institute Bergonié - Centre Régional de Lutte Contre le Cancer (CLCC), 33000 - Bordeaux/FR
  • 15 Department Of Radiology, CentreOscarLambret, 59020 - Lille/FR
  • 16 Medicine Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 - Lyon/FR

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 1718O

Background

REGO is a multikinase inhibitor showing efficacy as salvage treatment in non-adipocytic ASTS (Mir et al. Lancet Oncol. 2016). We explore here the role of REGO as maintenance therapy after 1st line treatment.

Methods

EREMISS (NCT03793361) was a double-blind, PBO-controlled, comparative, randomised phase 2 trial assessing the activity and safety of REGO (120 mg/d, 3 weeks / 4) in pts with non-adipocytic ASTS, who had stable disease (SD) or partial tumour response (PR) after 6 cycles of doxorubicin-based chemotherapy as 1st line treatment. There was no planned cross-over. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) according to RECIST 1.1 evaluated by blinded independent, central review (BICR). Based on the following assumptions: PFS(PBO)=4 mo, expected PFS(REGO)=7 mo, HR=0.57, 1-sided α=.05 and β=.10, 110 events (PD), 126 pts were required (see 1731TiP, ESMO 2019).

Results

The study population consisted of 126 pts (PBO: 62, REGO: 64) enrolled in 17 centres from May 2019 to Nov 2022, 55% female, median age=58 years (range, 18-85). The most common subtype was leiomyosarcoma (59%). All pts had previously received 6 cycles of doxorubicin-based chemotherapy (+ DTIC in 24%, IFO in 14%); PR in 30%, SD in 70%. Median follow-up was 27 mo. Median duration of treatment was 3.4 (PBO) vs 4.3 mo (REGO). The primary objective was assessable in 122 pts (109 events). Median PFS by BICR was 3.5 (PBO) vs 5.6 mo (REGO) (HR=0.51; p=.001). According to investigator assessment, median PFS was 3.6 vs 6.8 mo (HR=0.56, p=.002). Median OS was 21.0 vs 27.6 mo (HR=0.82; p=.41). The rate of Gr≥3 AEs was 11% (PBO) vs 66% (REGO). Toxicity led to permanent treatment discontinuation in 18/64 REGO pts (28%), 0/62 PBO. The most common Gr≥3 clinical AEs in REGO arm were asthenia (9%), arterial hypertension (8%) and rash (8%).

Conclusions

This trial met its primary objective, REGO significantly delays disease progression after doxorubicin-based 1st line treatment in ASTS. This was associated with a non-significant trend of OS improvement. This benefit must be balanced with the occurrence of AEs.

Clinical trial identification

NCT03793361 May 15, 2019.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Centre Oscar Lambret.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.