Abstract 2001P
Background
The management of patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC) has recently changed with the introduction of new first-line (1L) treatment options into ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Limited data exists on the impact of these changes on patients with la/mUC in France. Here, we describe and assess the epidemiology and treatment patterns in this patient population.
Methods
This was a descriptive, non-interventional, retrospective study of adult ≥18 years) patients with la/mUC identified from the Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d’Information, the French hospital discharge database; data were extracted from 01 Jan 2020 to 31 Dec 2022. The primary objective was to estimate the annual incidence and prevalence of patients with la/mUC in the general population, and the annual incidence of patients with la/mUC treated in 1L. Other objectives were a description of patients’ characteristics and treatment patterns for those treated in 1L.
Results
Of 39,857 patients with la/mUC, 25,217 patients were newly diagnosed with no evidence of treatment for a cancer other than UC after la/mUC diagnosis during the study period. Prevalence and incidence rates ranged from 38.2–41.6 and 16.8–19.2 cases/100,000 people respectively, from 2020–2022; rates of prevalence and incidence were about four-fold higher in men than women and were higher in older (≥60 years) versus younger patients. In patients who received 1L treatment (N=15,101), incidence ranged from 7.9–11.2 cases/100,000 people from 2020–2022; at the date of 1L treatment the mean (standard deviation) age of patients was 71 (9.8) years and 79.5% were male. Of patients that received 1L therapy with at least 6 months of potential follow-up (N=11,893), 64.5% received only 1L of treatment, 93.6% received chemotherapy as 1L, and 11.9–19.3% had subsequent avelumab maintenance therapy from 2020–2022.
Conclusions
Incidence rates of la/mUC increased over time in France during the study period, and most patients treated only received 1L of therapy. Avelumab usage remained low but increased over time. Further research is needed to assess the long-term impact of current 1L options.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Medical writing support was provided by Glen Dorrington, PhD, on behalf of Lumanity, funded by Astellas Pharma, Inc.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd.
Funding
Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd.
Disclosure
F. Joly Lobbedez: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Consulting fees: Astellas, Pfizer, Merck. M. Roupret: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role, Consulting fees: Ipsen, Astellas, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS. R. Minacori, T. Strunz-McKendry, K. Leyland, M. Vuillet, M. Thomas: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Employee: Astellas. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2019P - Disparities in urothelial carcinoma (UC) drug approval: Contrasting North America and Europe
Presenter: Jose Tapia
Session: Poster session 13
2020TiP - SOGUG-NEOWIN: A phase II, open-label, multi-centre trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of erdafitinib (ERDA) monotherapy and ERDA and cetrelimab (CET) as neoadjuvant treatment in cisplatin-ineligible patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and FGFR gene alterations
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster session 13
2022TiP - Stereotactic treatment with neoadjuvant radiotherapy and enfortumab vedotin: A phase I/II study for localized, cisplatin ineligible, muscle invasive bladder cancer (STAR-EV)
Presenter: Tian Zhang
Session: Poster session 13
2024TiP - NETOS: A personalized approach of neoadjuvant therapy, including INCB099280 monotherapy and bladder preservation, for muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma (MIBC) with ctDNA monitoring
Presenter: Valentina Tateo
Session: Poster session 13