Abstract 1353P
Background
The combination of docetaxel with nintedanib (D+N) or ramucirumab (D+R) is the standard of care for the second- or third- line therapy after simultaneous or sequential chemoimmunotherapy for patients (pts) with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without targetable molecular alterations. The combinations of D+N or D+R. were tested and approved before the immune checkpoint-inhibitors (ICI) became first-line treatment. Particularly, data about the safety of D+N or D+R after ICI treatment are limited.
Methods
Retrospective data were collected from 5 German cancer centers and practices. Only pts who had received at least 1 cycle of docetaxel with nintedanib (D+N) or ramucirumab (D+R) after a therapy that involved ICI were included. The number of cycles, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs) resulting in therapy discontinuation were assessed for all pts.
Results
173 pts were retrospectively recruited. Of them, 115 pts (66.5%) had an adenocarcinoma (ADC), 47 pts (27.2%) a squamous cell carcinoma and 5 pts (2.9%) a large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. 61 pts (35.3%) received D+N, 112 pts (64.7%) received D+R. To 69 pts (39.9%) docetaxel-based therapy (D+N or D+R) was administered as second-line, to 76 pts (43.9%) as third-line and to 28 pts (16.2%) as further line. ORR induced by D+N was 44.3% (27 pts), while it was 41.1% (73) achieved by D+R. A median of 6 induction and 5 maintenance cycles of D+N were administered compared to 3 induction and 4 maintenance cycles of D+R. 16 pts (27.1%) with D+N had a dose reduction, while 43 pts (53.7 %) with D+R were treated with a reduced dose. Median OS of all pts was 8.7 months. Focussing on ADC pts (105 pts), 60 pts (52%) received D+N and 55 pts (48%) D+R. Median OS was 9.5 months for D+N and 6.8 months for D+R, but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.16). Median OS of all ADC pts was 7.2 months.
Conclusions
In ADC pts the efficacy of D+N or D+R after chemoimmunotherapy was not significantly different. Docetaxel dose was reduced more often during D+R therapy. 20% of all pts had to stop therapy prematurely due to AEs.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
D.C. Christoph: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai, Ipsen, Merck, MSD Sharp & Dohme, Novocure, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1773P - Genomic and transcriptomic analysis of chondrosarcomas to explore new potential treatment options
Presenter: Konstantin Zirov
Session: Poster session 06
1774P - Immunological-molecular profiling of chondrosarcoma (ChS)
Presenter: Piotr Rutkowski
Session: Poster session 06
1775P - Peripheral blood (PB) T cell phenotype and tumor microenvironment (TME) subtype are independently associated with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) outcomes in sarcomas
Presenter: Evan Rosenbaum
Session: Poster session 06
1776P - Targeting B7H3 biomimetic nanoparticles for strengthening osteosarcoma photodynamic therapy through aggravating DNA damage
Presenter: Tianqi Luo
Session: Poster session 06
1777P - Molecular profiling from next-generation sequencing (NGS) reveals new potential therapeutic targets in patients with pediatric-type sarcomas
Presenter: Anthony Conley
Session: Poster session 06
1778P - Clear cell sarcomas (CCS) express Gp100: A novel immune target for a bispecific T cell engager
Presenter: Elise Nassif Haddad
Session: Poster session 06
1779P - Deep learning tertiary lymphoid structures detection on HES/H&E slides and association to survival outcome in sarcoma
Presenter: Lucile Vanhersecke
Session: Poster session 06
1780P - Homologous recombination pathway in sarcomas: A novel opportunity of therapy?
Presenter: María del Carmen Garijo Martínez
Session: Poster session 06