Abstract 1634P
Background
The EAU guidelines and the latest recommendations from the US Prostate Cancer Conference suggest a castration threshold of 20 ng/dl. However, the current NCCN and AUA guidelines still recommend a castration standard of 50 ng/dl. It remains unknown whether there is a relationship between maintaining lower testosterone levels and the prognosis of non-metastatic CRPC patients.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective analysis based on two phase III clinical trials (SPARTAN, ARAMIS). Patients received the currently recommended first-line treatment regimens (ADT+apalutamide or ADT+darolutamide) were classified into two groups according to their maintenance levels of serum testosterone during treatment: below 20 ng/dl and above 20 ng/dl. The study endpoint was MFS. IPTW method was employed to balance patients’ baseline characteristics. Kaplan-Meier analysis, multivariable Cox regression models, and Cox models that included testosterone levels as a time-dependent covariate were utilized to investigate the influence of maintenance levels of serum testosterone on disease progression.
Results
Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the low testosterone group and the high testosterone group after applying IPTW weights. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that serum testosterone maintenance levels were not associated with disease progression in either trial. In both multivariable Cox regression models and time-dependent Cox regression models, serum testosterone maintenance levels remained unrelated to disease progression, using below 20 ng/dl as the reference group (multivariable Cox: SPARTAN HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.44-0.99; P < 0.05], ARAMIS HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.57-1.23; P = 0.362]; time-dependent Cox: SPARTAN HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.60-1.21; P = 0.365], ARAMIS HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.58-1.17; P = 0.222]). The results obtained by setting testosterone levels as a continuous variable were similar.
Conclusions
Among men all with testosterone <50 ng/ml, maintenance serum testosterone levels were not associated with disease progression in the first-line management of nmCRPC with NHTs. The prognostic value of maintaining testosterone levels in patients with nmCRPC is limited.
Clinical trial identification
NCT01946204, NCT02200614.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1709P - Outcomes with novel combinations in non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC): ORACLE study
Presenter: Deepak Kilari
Session: Poster session 11
1710P - Exposure-response (E/R) relationship of nivolumab (N) and ipilimumab (I) in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell clear cell carcinoma (mRCC) from the randomised phase II BIONIKK study
Presenter: Benoit Blanchet
Session: Poster session 11
1711P - Real-word data challenging the treatment paradigm in metastatic renal cancer: Time to separate IMDC intermediate / poor risk groups?
Presenter: John McGrane
Session: Poster session 11
1712P - Real-world efficacy of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab and its practical predictive biomarkers in advanced renal cell carcinoma: First analysis from RENOIR study [KCSG GU22-13]
Presenter: Jwa Hoon Kim
Session: Poster session 11
1713P - A deep learning approach utilizing the electronic health record (EHR) to identify cancer recurrence in renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
Presenter: Jue Hou
Session: Poster session 11
1714P - Detection and monitoring of translocation renal cell carcinoma via epigenomic profiling of cell-free DNA
Presenter: Simon Garinet
Session: Poster session 11
1715P - Interim analysis results from a phase II study of adjuvant penpulimab in very high-risk clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Xu Zhang
Session: Poster session 11
1716P - Primary resistance to front-line immune-based combinations in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (ARON-1)
Presenter: martina catalano
Session: Poster session 11