Abstract 741P
Background
Determination of the molecular subtype of endometrial cancer has been shown to be prognostic and predictive and is therefore essential for treatment decisions and prognosis prediction in endometrial cancer. Therefore, assessment of mismatch repair protein (MMR) deficiency by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and sequential microsatellite instability (MSI) in cases with indeterminate protein expression status is part of routine diagnostics in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer. Several methods are available for MSI analysis.
Methods
We compared the Idylla™ MSI Assay (Biocartis) with our institutional MSI gold standard test (Bethesda panel) and with MMR IHC in a cohort of n=332 hysterectomy specimen of endometrioid adenocarcinomas of the corpus uteri (2008-2016). MSI tests were performed according to the manufacturer's recommendations (Idylla™) and a validated internal protocol (Bethesda panel). MMR IHC was analyzed using tissue microarrays, but repeated on whole slides in case of a negative internal control or a discrepancy with the MSI test. The Idylla™ MSI results were compared with the Bethesda MSI results and the MMR-IHC.
Results
In our cohort of n=332 endometrioid endometrial cancer cases, MMR IHC, Idylla™ MSI and gold standard (Bethesda) MSI test results were evaluable in all cases, n=325, and n=324, respectively. N=87/332 (26.2%) had MMR deficiency (MMRd) with n=78/332 (23.5%) showing MLH1/PMS2 loss. The Idylla™ MSI assay revealed MSI in n=68/325 (20.9%) cases. Idylla™ results agreed with MMR IHC results in n=303/325 cases (overall percentage agreement (OPA)=93.2%; Kappa= 0.814). Bethesda results were consistent with MMR IHC results in n=310/324 cases (OPA=95.7%; Kappa= 0.884). Both Idylla™ and Bethesda MSI results were available for n=322/332 cases (97.0%) with n=308/322 concordant cases. OPA between the two MSI test methods was therefore 95.65% (Kappa= 0.874).
Conclusions
Idylla™ MSI showed a very high OPA with the gold standard MSI test and with MMR IHC. In view of its short turnaround time and ease of use, this test could therefore be an excellent alternative for MSI testing in endometrial cancer, even with old tissue samples.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Biocartis provided the cartridges free of charge.
Disclosure
R. Erber: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: Biocartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca. I. Unser, A. Hartmann, R. Stöhr: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: Biocartis. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
744P - A phase II study of ACR-368 in patients with ovarian (OvCa) or endometrial carcinoma (EnCa) and prospective validation of OncoSignature patient selection (NCT05548296)
Presenter: Jung-Min Lee
Session: Poster session 01
745P - Biomarker-driven targeted therapy in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (BRIGHT): An open-label, multicenter, umbrella trial
Presenter: Qinglei Gao
Session: Poster session 01
746P - Phase III MIRASOL trial: Updated overall survival results of mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV) vs. investigator’s choice chemotherapy (ICC) in patients (pts) with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) and high folate receptor-alpha (FRα) expression
Presenter: Lan Gardner Coffman
Session: Poster session 01
747P - SOLACE2: A phase II randomized trial of olaparib (O) and durvalumab (D) with or without low dose cyclophosphamide (LDCy) in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC)
Presenter: Clare Scott
Session: Poster session 01
748P - Phase II dose optimization with EZH2/EZH1 inhibitor tulmimetostat in patients with ARID1A-mutated ovarian clear cell carcinoma
Presenter: Ana Oaknin
Session: Poster session 01
750P - Phase I safety and efficacy of brenetafusp, a PRAME × CD3 ImmTAC T cell engager, in platinum resistant ovarian cancer (PROC)
Presenter: Claire Friedman
Session: Poster session 01