Abstract 669P
Background
Tumor-targeted drug delivery technologies are urgently needed to overcome conventional chemotherapy’s lack of tumor selectivity. Alphalex conjugates, which contain a pH-low insertion peptide (pHLIP), a linker and a payload are designed to overcome this lack of selectivity. Alphalex PDCs target tumors in an antigen-independent manner. At pH 7.4, the peptide is unstructured. In the low pH tumor microenvironment the peptide forms an alpha helix and inserts directionally into the tumor cell membrane delivering the linker and payload. For CBX-12 the payload is exatecan.
Methods
In this Phase 1 trial, cohorts of pts were treated with escalating doses of CBX-12 in a 3 + 3 design. The primary objectives are safety, tolerability and to determine the MTD/RP2D. Secondary and exploratory objectives include evaluation of plasma PK of CBX-12 and exatecan, anti-tumor activity per RECIST v1.1, and measurement of anti-drug antibodies.
Results
Enrollment is complete with 69 pts having been treated on study. The most frequent treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were anaemia (53.6%), leukopenia (42.0%), neutropenia (40.6%), nausea (39.1%), and fatigue (36.2%). The most frequent Gr3/4 TRAEs were neutropenia, (27.5%), anaemia (24.6%), leukopenia (21.7%), and thrombocytopenia (13.0%). No ILD or ophthalmic toxicity was reported. There were 5 confirmed responses in ovarian (2), breast (2), and colorectal cancer (1). Evidence of activity was also seen in NSCLC, cholangiocarcinoma, and thymic cancer. Of 12 patients with ovarian cancer there was one confirmed complete response, one confirmed partial response (PR) and tw0 unconfirmed PRs. 8 of 12 saw clinical benefit. The RP2D was established as 125mg/m2 every 21 days.
Conclusions
Tumor targeting facilitated by this pH sensitive peptide made possible an improved safety profile despite the administration of a 5-fold increase in the dose of exatecan compared to unconjugated exatecan. The dose limiting toxicity is myelosuppression. CBX-12 demonstrated broad activity with 5 confirmed responses in three malignancies. A randomized Phase 2 study in platinum resistant ovarian cancer is underway comparing two doses on the once every 21 day schedule.
Clinical trial identification
NCT04902872.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Cybrexa Inc.
Funding
Cybrexa Inc.
Disclosure
F. Meric-Bernstam: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Funding: Cybrexa, Inc. P. Pearson: Financial Interests, Personal, Financially compensated role, Consultant: Cybrexa, Inc. M.N. Needle: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Cybrexa, Inc. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
744P - A phase II study of ACR-368 in patients with ovarian (OvCa) or endometrial carcinoma (EnCa) and prospective validation of OncoSignature patient selection (NCT05548296)
Presenter: Jung-Min Lee
Session: Poster session 01
745P - Biomarker-driven targeted therapy in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (BRIGHT): An open-label, multicenter, umbrella trial
Presenter: Qinglei Gao
Session: Poster session 01
746P - Phase III MIRASOL trial: Updated overall survival results of mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV) vs. investigator’s choice chemotherapy (ICC) in patients (pts) with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) and high folate receptor-alpha (FRα) expression
Presenter: Lan Gardner Coffman
Session: Poster session 01
747P - SOLACE2: A phase II randomized trial of olaparib (O) and durvalumab (D) with or without low dose cyclophosphamide (LDCy) in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC)
Presenter: Clare Scott
Session: Poster session 01
748P - Phase II dose optimization with EZH2/EZH1 inhibitor tulmimetostat in patients with ARID1A-mutated ovarian clear cell carcinoma
Presenter: Ana Oaknin
Session: Poster session 01
750P - Phase I safety and efficacy of brenetafusp, a PRAME × CD3 ImmTAC T cell engager, in platinum resistant ovarian cancer (PROC)
Presenter: Claire Friedman
Session: Poster session 01