Abstract 1655P
Background
BRCA (likely) pathogenic variants (PVs) have been consistently associated with aggressive phenotypes and adverse clinical outcomes in prostate cancer (PC). Recent research showed the association of location of BRCA PVs with benefit from olaparib in ovarian cancer. In PC, although lower cancer risk for BRCA2 carriers has been observed for PVs in a specific BRCA2 region (OCCR), the magnitude of PARP-inhibitor (PARPi) benefit according to the BRCA PV location is still unknown.
Methods
This was a real-world, multicenter, study including PC patients undergoing BRCA/Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR) germline (g), somatic (s), and liquid biopsy (lb) testing between January 2020 and April 2024. In the current analysis, prognostic factors and treatment outcomes were evaluated according to PV location within the functional domains (FDs) of BRCA genes.
Results
946 metastatic PC patients, aged 40 to 91, were included; 198 (20.9%) showed germline (54, 5.7%) or somatic (144, 15.2%) PVs in HRR genes: 21 BRCA1 (4 gBRCA1, 2%; 17 sBRCA1, 8.6% ), 124 BRCA2 (39 gBRCA2, 19.7%; 85 sBRCA2, 42.9%), and 56 no-BRCA HRR genes (11 gHRR, 5.5%; 45 sHRR, 22.7%). Liquid biopsy identified PVs in 39 patients out of 238 tested (16.4%), including 12 (5%) not detected through s/g testing, considerably expanding the therapeutic window for PARPi use. When we compared BRCA1 and BRCA2 subgroups, median PFS to PARPi was significantly longer for BRCA2 [7.0 months (95%CI 5.4-8.6) vs 11.0 months (95%CI 5.7-16.2), p=0.01]. Notably, differences in OS and PFS were observed depending on BRCA PV location. Greater benefit from PARPi was in patients with PVs in the DBD FDs of BRCA2, compared with RAD51-BD, or other location [15.0 months (95%CI 9.6-20.3) vs 8.0 months (95%CI 2.2-13.8) vs 7.0 months (95%CI 3.6-10.4), respectively; p=0.03], emphasizing the critical role of PV location on treatment outcomes. Outcomes following ARSi and taxanes, tissue used and timing of genetic testing were also assessed.
Conclusions
To our knowledge, this is the first real-world study providing preliminary evidence that not all BRCA2-mutated PCs are equally sensitive to PARPis, and the benefit could depend on the PV location within BRCA FDs.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1709P - Outcomes with novel combinations in non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC): ORACLE study
Presenter: Deepak Kilari
Session: Poster session 11
1710P - Exposure-response (E/R) relationship of nivolumab (N) and ipilimumab (I) in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell clear cell carcinoma (mRCC) from the randomised phase II BIONIKK study
Presenter: Benoit Blanchet
Session: Poster session 11
1711P - Real-word data challenging the treatment paradigm in metastatic renal cancer: Time to separate IMDC intermediate / poor risk groups?
Presenter: John McGrane
Session: Poster session 11
1712P - Real-world efficacy of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab and its practical predictive biomarkers in advanced renal cell carcinoma: First analysis from RENOIR study [KCSG GU22-13]
Presenter: Jwa Hoon Kim
Session: Poster session 11
1713P - A deep learning approach utilizing the electronic health record (EHR) to identify cancer recurrence in renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
Presenter: Jue Hou
Session: Poster session 11
1714P - Detection and monitoring of translocation renal cell carcinoma via epigenomic profiling of cell-free DNA
Presenter: Simon Garinet
Session: Poster session 11
1715P - Interim analysis results from a phase II study of adjuvant penpulimab in very high-risk clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Xu Zhang
Session: Poster session 11
1716P - Primary resistance to front-line immune-based combinations in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (ARON-1)
Presenter: martina catalano
Session: Poster session 11