Abstract 265P
Background
In early stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy is standard of treatment. Adjuvant capecitabine showed improved survival in patients with residual disease. However, the data on clinical benefits of adjuvant capecitabine according to residual cancer burden (RCB) are insufficient.
Methods
Among patients with early TNBC who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery at Asan Medical Center in Seoul, Republic of Korea, between February 2008 and December 2021, those with residual tumors were included. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) as per STEEP version 2.0 was compared according to adjuvant capecitabine and RCB class.
Results
The study included 922 patients, with a median age of 47 years (range: 24–78). Of these, 230 (24.9%) received adjuvant capecitabine (capecitabine group) while 692 (75.0%) did not receive any adjuvant chemotherapy (observation group). Most patients (87.8%) received anthracycline and cyclophosphamide, with or without taxane, as part of their neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen. RCB class well discriminated patients into prognostic groups with 2-year RFS of 69%, 58%, and 31% for patients with RCB class 1 (n=126), 2 (n=577), and 3 (n=219), respectively. No significant differences in clinical characteristics, including RCB class, were observed between the two groups (p=0.23). RFS analysis showed a trend toward improved outcomes in the capecitabine group (log-rank p=0.06). Specifically, no significant differences were found in RFS between the groups for RCB class 1 (p > 0.99) and 2 (p=0.43). However, in RCB class 3 patients, capecitabine group showed significantly better RFS compared to the observation group (log-rank p=0.02) and this was consistent in the multivariable analysis, showing a hazard ratio of 0.45 (95% CI: 0.25–0.81, p=0.007), indicating a statistically significant benefit of adjuvant capecitabine in this subgroup.
Conclusions
Adjuvant capecitabine showed clinical benefit in patients with TNBC who had residual tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and the benefit was more significant in patients with higher tumor burden with RCB class 3.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
302P - Perceptions of women with HER2+ breast cancer on the risk of recurrence and disease management: Results from the ASKHER survey
Presenter: Matteo Lambertini
Session: Poster session 14
303P - Predicting quality of life trajectories in young women with breast cancer: 5-year results from a large prospective cohort
Presenter: Bryan Vaca-Cartagena
Session: Poster session 14
304P - Impact of estrogen receptor positivity for adjuvant endocrine therapy in luminal T1a/bN0M0 breast cancer: A multi-institutional retrospective observational study
Presenter: Shinsuke Sasada
Session: Poster session 14
305P - Prognosis of isolated locoregional recurrence after early breast cancer with immediate breast reconstruction surgery: A retrospective multi-institutional study
Presenter: Hirohito Seki
Session: Poster session 14
306P - Patient-reported symptoms in early breast cancer and future cardiovascular events: A province-wide administrative database study
Presenter: Edith Pituskin
Session: Poster session 14
307P - Exposure to Di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate and breast cancer incidence: A cohort study
Presenter: Lijuan Tang
Session: Poster session 14
308P - Impact of the COVID-19 (C19) pandemic on breast cancer (BC) treatment patterns in the US
Presenter: Mariana Chavez Mac Gregor
Session: Poster session 14
310P - Identification of racial disparities across MammaPrint and BluePrint subtypes in HR+HER2- breast cancer
Presenter: Sonya Reid
Session: Poster session 14
311P - Optimizing breast cancer staging: Redefining tumor size classification using big data analytics
Presenter: Bin Feng
Session: Poster session 14