Abstract 1121P
Background
Improving the prognostication of melanoma is crucial for selecting patients for effective adjuvant therapies. Given that tumor tissue contains a large amount of clinically relevant hidden information that is not fully exploited, we applied a weakly-supervised deep learning approach to H&E-stained whole slide images (WSIs) to directly predict BRAF mutational status.
Methods
We designed an artificial intelligence algorithm that extracts features from no-padding patches of WSIs using a pre-trained deep neural network. These features are then fed into a classifier that assigns a BRAF mutational status probability to each WSI. The model was trained and validated using a cross-validation approach on 220 WSIs from the IHP Group (IHP-MEL-BRAF) with patients included from April 2014 to January 2023. The model was tested on the publicly available TCGA cohort. We used the area under the curve (AUC) as the metric to assess the performance of the model.
Results
The model yielded an AUC of 78.3% on the cross-validation folds and 75.7% on the testing folds. We show that the performance of the model is impacted by the amount of tumoral tissue present in the WSI, and that thin melanomas are highly subject to false predictions. In the external data, the model achieves an AUC of 68.3%. As the model learns to assign a weight to the tiles contributing to the mutational status characterization, we explore the main phenotypes that are more likely to explain the BRAF mutational status.
Conclusions
This pilot study in melanoma demonstrates that this novel deep-learning approach to H&E image analysis is capable of discovering new digital predictive and prognostic biomarkers. It has the advantage of leaving the exploration of the WSI and the selection of regions of interest entirely to the AI, thus reducing the bias introduced by annotations. Furthermore, these findings could potentially accelerate and improve the clinical decision-making process in the field of melanoma in the near future.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1091P - Neoadjuvant cemiplimab for stage II–IV cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC): 2-year follow-up and biomarker analyses
Presenter: Danny Rischin
Session: Poster session 04
1092P - Nivolumab plus relatlimab vs nivolumab in previously untreated metastatic or unresectable melanoma: 3-year subgroup analyses from RELATIVITY-047
Presenter: Dirk Schadendorf
Session: Poster session 04
1093P - Preliminary biomarker analysis in the phase III PIVOTAL study: Evidence for the mechanism of action of daromun in melanoma
Presenter: Paolo Ascierto
Session: Poster session 04
1094P - NeoRisk: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NeoIT) recurrence risk assessment tool
Presenter: Ines Pires da Silva
Session: Poster session 04
1095P - Pembrolizumab versus placebo after a complete resection of high-risk stage III melanoma: 7-year results of the EORTC 1325-MG/Keynote-054 double-blind phase III trial
Presenter: Alexander Eggermont
Session: Poster session 04
1096P - Camrelizumab plus apatinib in patients with advanced mucosal melanoma: A 3-year survival update with biomarker analysis
Presenter: Zhengyun Zou
Session: Poster session 04
1098P - Mechanisms of recurrence following mRNA-4157 (V940) plus pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab alone in resected melanoma from the mRNA-4157-P201 (KEYNOTE-942) trial
Presenter: Ryan Sullivan
Session: Poster session 04
1099P - COMBI-EU: Adverse event management of adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib (D+T) in patients with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Peter Mohr
Session: Poster session 04
1100P - Anti-PD1 + low-dose anti-CTLA4 immunotherapy pathological response rate in patients with stage III resectable melanoma: Phase III NEOMIMAJOR trial interim analysis
Presenter: Igor Samoylenko
Session: Poster session 04