Abstract 222P
Background
Baseline (BL) disease burden, measured via sum of longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, is a known prognostic factor and contributes to evaluating treatment response in phase 1-3 solid tumor clinical trials. However, SLD may not comprehensively capture overall disease burden and thus may have limited prognostic utility. AI tools like imaging-based prognostication (IPRO), a fully automated deep learning pipeline independently trained on real-world CT scans and survival outcomes of people with aNSCLC, may enable more accurate prognostication and assessment of treatment effect.
Methods
We retrospectively examine how SLD and IPRO predict OS from 453 pre-treatment CT scans acquired in NExUS (NCT00449033), a phase 3 randomized controlled trial evaluating chemotherapy in combination with either sorafenib or placebo for first-line treatment of subjects with aNSCLC. The two study arms did not have a difference in OS and were combined for this study. For both SLD and IPRO, we measure the concordance index (c-index) and Kaplan-Meier curves stratified by covariate tertiles to estimate median overall survival (mOS). Hazard ratios (HRs) from proportional hazards models based on the standardized continuous values estimate the prognostic strength.
Results
The mOS was 12.0 months (95% CI: 10.3 – 13.2), 295 patients (64.8%) were male, and 401 (88%) were diagnosed as stage IV. At baseline, IPRO and SLD yielded a c-index of 0.64 and 0.60, respectively. The HR per 1SD change for IPRO (1.56) was 13% higher than for SLD (1.38). Table: 222P
Summary of mOS and HR for OS by SLD and IPRO
c-index | mOS | HR (95% CI) | p | |
SLD (continuous) | 0.60 | 12.0 | 1.38 (1.26 − 1.53) | < 0.005 |
SLD: Lowest 33% (vs high) | – | 15.5 | 0.49 (0.37 − 0.64) | < 0.005 |
SLD: Intermediate 33% (vs high) | – | 11.9 | 0.67 (0.52 − 0.86) | < 0.005 |
SLD: Intermediate 33% (vs high) | – | 9.4 | – | – |
IPRO (continuous) | 0.64 | 12.0 | 1.56 (1.40 − 1.74) | < 0.005 |
IPRO: Lowest 33% (vs high) | – | 17.3 | 0.37 (0.29 − 0.49) | < 0.005 |
IPRO: Intermediate 33% (vs high) | – | 12.0 | 0.58 (0.45 − 0.74) | < 0.005 |
IPRO: Highest 33% | – | 7.9 | – | – |
Conclusions
IPRO is more strongly correlated with OS compared to SLD at BL, and future work may prove IPRO to have greater clinical utility than traditional radiologic lesion measurements.
Clinical trial identification
NCT00449033.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Bayer.
Disclosure
O.F. Khan: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Gilead, Knight Therapeutics, Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Research Support: Altis Labs, Inc. J. Montalt-Tordera: Financial Interests, Institutional, Full or part-time Employment: Bayer. J. Riskas, V. Sivan, O. Samorodova, J. Hennessy, A. Mitchell: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Altis Labs. S.A. Haider, S.S. Mohammadi, E. Di Tomaso, T. Banerji, C. Glaus: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Bayer. F. Baldauf-Lenschen: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Leadership Role: Altis Labs.
Resources from the same session
225P - Nivolumab for cancer of unknown primary (CUP): Clinical efficacy and biomarker analysis from NivoCUP2 expanded access program (WJOG14620M)
Presenter: Junko Tanizaki
Session: Poster session 09
226TiP - CLEAR-Me: Interception trial to detect and clear molecular residual disease in patients with high-risk melanoma
Presenter: Erick Saldanha
Session: Poster session 09
227TiP - A phase II, open label, randomized, non-comparative cohorts study of adjuvant atezolizumab or atezolizumab plus tiragolumab in solid tumors with resectable disease with intermediate-high risk of recurrence and high tumor mutational burden (TMB-H) or microsatellite instability (MSI-H)
Presenter: Guillermo Antonio De Velasco Oria
Session: Poster session 09
228TiP - FINPROVE: The Finnish national study to facilitate patient access to targeted anti-cancer drugs
Presenter: Mika Mustonen
Session: Poster session 09
229TiP - A phase II trial of a neural network-based treatment decision support tool in patients (pts) with refractory solid organ malignancies
Presenter: Robert Walsh
Session: Poster session 09
230TiP - Exploring mechanisms of action and resistance in innovate cancer therapies: The UNLOCK program
Presenter: Beatriz Alonso de Castro
Session: Poster session 09
694P - Sequential high-dose-chemotherapy with 4 cycles paclitaxel, ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide (P-ICE) in relapsed/refractory male germ cell cancer: Final results with 15.8 years follow-up
Presenter: Hans Joachim Schmoll
Session: Poster session 09
695P - Assessment of the utility of CT scans in the long-term follow-up of metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (mNSGCT): The Late CT study
Presenter: Deep Chakrabarti
Session: Poster session 09
696P - Post chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) for metastatic pure seminoma
Presenter: David Pfister
Session: Poster session 09
697P - The Empower Pathway overview: An innovative approach to delivering personalised care for testicular cancer survivors
Presenter: Robert Holwell
Session: Poster session 09