Abstract 144P
Background
Immune checkpoint blockers (ICB) are in the forefront of contemporary clinical oncology and have become an integral part of treatment of many malignancies, including metastatic head and neck cancers (HNC). Nevertheless, tumor response to ICB varies widely, with known predictive biomarkers, such as combined PDL score (CPS) showing limited predictive value. We present results of a blind retrospective analysis of a novel predictive digital pathology biomarker of ICB in HNC.
Methods
We obtained high resolution Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) slides from tumor-tissue samples of 26 cases of metastatic HNC patients treated with first-line PD-1 inhibitors, all with CPS>1%. We applied our ENLIGHT-DP pipeline to generate, in a blinded manner, individual response scores to PD-1 inhibition for each slide. ENLIGHT-DP has two main steps: (i) prediction of mRNA expression directly from an H&E slide using DeepPT, our digital-pathology based algorithm; (ii) use of these values as input to ENLIGHT, our transcriptome-based precision oncology platform, which generates a score that predicts response to targeted therapies and ICB (based on a 10-gene signature in this case, composed of the key genetically interacting genes of PD-1). We then unblinded the clinical response (RECIST1.1), and evaluated ENLIGHT-DP’s performance.
Results
ENLIGHT-DP’s score is predictive of response in this cohort, which had an overall response rate of 54% (14/26), with ROC AUC = 0.65. Using a predefined threshold for binary classification of response derived from independent data, 6 of 8 patients that were predicted to respond by ENLIGHT-DP indeed responded (75% PPV, 43% sensitivity, Odds Ratio of 3.75). In comparison, stratification by CPS exhibits no predictive power (PPV of 50% and 58%, respectively, for CPS > 20% and CPS 1-19%, and AUC of 0.46 for CPS as a continuous score).
Conclusions
ENLIGHT-DP demonstrates high predictive power for response to ICB in first-line HNC, outperforming the commonly used CPS marker. Importantly, our approach does not require training on prior treatment outcomes, and can therefore be generalized to drugs for which such data is unavailable or scarce.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
O. Tirosh, L. Gugel, G. Dinstag, Y. Kinar, T. Gottlieb, R. Aharonov: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Pangea Biomed. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
112P - Reporting of molecular test results from cell-free DNA analyses: Expert consensus recommendations from the 2023 European Liquid Biopsy Society ctDNA workshop
Presenter: Vincent de Jager
Session: Poster session 08
114P - Prevalence and landscape of pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants in cancer predisposition genes among selected patients with lung adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Oscar Gerardo Arrieta Rodriguez
Session: Poster session 08
115P - Gene rearrangements, actionability and access to precision medicine: Results from the ARCAGEN study
Presenter: Marie Morfouace
Session: Poster session 08
116P - Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals a subset of FSIP1 cancer cells and verified its value of prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Xiaochen Zhang
Session: Poster session 08
Resources:
Abstract
117P - Methylome and transcriptome profiling of hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach
Presenter: Shirong Zhang
Session: Poster session 08
Resources:
Abstract
118P - Comparative analysis of DNA and RNA-based NGS for detecting MET exon 14 skipping mutation in pan-solid tumor samples
Presenter: Ruijun Cai
Session: Poster session 08
119P - Predicting the pathogenicity of novel fusion genes and explaining reasons using a large language model: A focused assessment
Presenter: Katsuhiko Murakami
Session: Poster session 08
120P - A prospective comparative evaluation of automatic trial match tools in a molecular tumor board
Presenter: Lilia GUEGUEN
Session: Poster session 08