Abstract 1549P
Background
In July 2021, France initiated a significant overhaul of the Early Access (EA) process, replacing the former Authorization for Use (ATU) system. This reform aimed to simplify procedures and expedite access to innovative drugs. This study examined the characteristics of oncology (including onco-hematology) drug approvals through the AE process and assessed the methodological quality of clinical trials supporting these requests.
Methods
All oncology applications submitted to the National Health Authority (HAS) since the EA reform (from July 1, 2021) until December 31, 2023 were identified, reviewing approval decisions, timelines, and reasons for acceptance or rejection. The therapeutic class (ATC) of drugs, cancer site and stage were identified, and the data characterizing clinical trials supporting the requests from reviews provided by HAS and clinicaltrial.gov.
Results
Out of 171 EA approvals (including renewal), 88 (51%) were granted for oncologic indications, with evaluation time by HAS of 71 days on average. Excluding renewals, 48 drugs for 53 indications in oncology received EA approval, predominantly monoclonal antibodies or antibody drug conjugates (49%) and CAR-T cell therapies (17%). Most approved indications were in solid oncology (35, 66%), mainly in digestive (23%), urological (23%), or breast cancers (20%), in metastatic indications in the first-line (31%) or second-line (23%). Onco-hematology authorizations accounted for 18 indications (34%), mostly in the third line and beyond (56%). Oncology drugs approved through the EA pathway were primarily backed by phase III trials (70%), including direct comparison (72%) and/or randomization (70%) whereas refused EA drugs were frequently supported by indirect comparison or non-comparative trials (50%). Overall survival (OS) was included as primary or secondary endpoints in 55% of approved EAs, with mature data available in 36% of trials.
Conclusions
The French EA reform has expedited approval across various indications, facilitating access to innovative drugs like monoclonal antibodies or antibody-drug conjugates, notably in solid oncology for metastatic indications. Ensuring high-quality studies is crucial for EA success, with mature data frequently provided.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1564P - Limited participation in breast cancer screening among low-SES women: A matter of engagement or of health literacy?
Presenter: Allegra Ferrari
Session: Poster session 10
1566P - Optimizing participation in lung cancer screening program: Results from the first round in ILYAD study in Lyon University Hospital
Presenter: Emmanuel Grolleau
Session: Poster session 10
1567P - Physicians' adenoma detection rate and the risk of colorectal cancer in sequential screening programs: An observational cohort study
Presenter: Li Xie
Session: Poster session 10
1568P - Challenges in pilot lung cancer screening in Vojvodina, Serbia
Presenter: Jelena Djekic Malbasa
Session: Poster session 10
1569P - Secondary delay in breast cancer diagnosis and role of rural medical practitioners: A cause and cure finding study
Presenter: Rahul Agarwal
Session: Poster session 10
1570P - Factors and impacts of delayed presentation for county-level patients with breast cancer in a real-life setting in China
Presenter: Yinghua Ji
Session: Poster session 10
1571P - The reasons that motivate a change of specialties among oncology residents
Presenter: Christophe Ducrocq
Session: Poster session 10
1572P - Factors associated with career choice in oncology among medical students
Presenter: Nicolas Penel
Session: Poster session 10
1573P - Global cancer statistics for adolescents and young adults: New estimates from GLOBOCAN 2022
Presenter: Wang-Zhong Li
Session: Poster session 10
Resources:
Abstract