Abstract 570P
Background
Pathological complete response (pCR) rate for conventional chemoradiotherapy regimens as neoadjuvant therapy for LARC were not that satisfactory. Fru and SCRT have both shown synergistic effects in combination with immunotherapy in colorectal cancer. We conducted this study to assess the safety and efficacy of the combination of Fru and Tor with SCRT as neoadjuvant therapy for LARC.
Methods
This is a prospective, single-arm study. 40 pts with T3-4 and/or N+ LARC will be included. Enrolled pts will receive Fru 5mg po, d1-d14, Tor 240mg i.v, d1, q3w for 4 cycles. SCRT (5 Gy x 5) was simultaneously conducted d1-d5 during the 2nd cycle. Eligible pts will undergo TME surgery within 2-4 weeks after completing neoadjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint was pCR rate. Based on Simon’s 2 stage design, 40 pts were required with a two side α of 0.05 and a power of 80%, estimating a desirable pCR 30% and an unacceptable pCR 12%.
Results
As of Feb 2024, 23 pts were enrolled, and their baseline characteristics are presented in the table. 22 (95.7%) pts presented a high-risk profile, marked by factors such as cT4, cN2, EMVI+, or MRF+. 19 pts completed the neoadjuvant treatment, and 16 pts underwent TME surgery, with a R0 resection rate of 100%. Anal preservation rate reached 75% (12/16). Six pts achieved pCR, yielding a pCR rate of 37.5% (95% CI: 13.8%-61.2%). Additionally, 10 (62.5%) pts achieved tumor regression grade (AJCC) of 0/1. The most common treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) included hypertension (56.5%), thyroid dysfunction (43.5%), and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrom (34.8%). Grade 3 TRAEs include hypertension (26.1%), platelet count decreased (4.3%), ALT increased (4.3%) and diarrhea (4.3%). No grade 4/5 TRAEs was observed. This trial is ongoing. Table: 570P
Characteristics | Pts (N = 23) n (%) | |
Age | Median (Range) | 58 (32-74) |
Sex | MaleFemale | 12 (52.2)11 (47.8) |
ECOG PS | 01 | 5 (21.7)18 (78.3) |
MMR status | pMMR | 23 (100) |
Distance from tumor to anal verge | Median (Range) | 3.8 cm (2.2 -11.9 cm) |
EMVI | Positive | 17 (73.9) |
T category | T4 | 8 (34.8) |
N category | N2 | 21 (91.3) |
MRF | Positive | 15 (65.2) |
Conclusions
Combination of Fru, Tor and SCRT has shown a potential efficacy for the neoadjuvant therapy of LARC with a tolerable toxicity.
Clinical trial identification
NCT05763927.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
489P - Interfering with the tumor microenvironment of glioblastoma: An in vitro study
Presenter: Serena Mastantuono
Session: Poster session 16
490P - Inhibiting glioma cells' migration: Exploring Rho-GTPases as a potential therapeutic target
Presenter: Irene Giulia Rolle
Session: Poster session 16
Resources:
Abstract
491P - SRSF7 promotes glioblastoma progression via CDK1-mediated G2/M phase arrest of GBM cells
Presenter: Ya qin Hu
Session: Poster session 16
Resources:
Abstract
492P - Linking cellular drug responses to corresponding metabolomic tissue signatures in gliomas
Presenter: Stefanie Stanzer
Session: Poster session 16
493P - The usefulness of pre-radiotherapy MRI in assessing pseudo-progression in patients with glioblastoma included in first-line clinical trials
Presenter: Kreina Vega Cano
Session: Poster session 16
494P - Effect of a new method for operating electric field patches on scalp reactions in glioblastoma patients receiving tumor treating fields
Presenter: Jinghui Liu
Session: Poster session 16
Resources:
Abstract
495P - Clinicopathological risk factors for prognosis and therapeutic response of primary central nervous system lymphoma in China: A single-center retrospective analysis of 118 cases
Presenter: Feng Chen
Session: Poster session 16
496P - Association of brain metastasis and peritumoral edema volume with the neurological symptom burden in lung cancer patients
Presenter: Ariane Steindl
Session: Poster session 16
497P - Does the primary location and metastatic timing of colorectal cancer influence the survival of patients with brain metastasis? A meta-analysis
Presenter: Junmin Song
Session: Poster session 16