Abstract 1745P
Background
Treatment abandonment (TA) is a major challenge in cancer care leading to poor outcomes and wastage of resources. Reasons for TA are multi-factorial and country specific. Understanding these complexities is the first step toward developing effective strategies for the prevention of TA. Insights and experiences of healthcare workers (HCWs) can provide valuable information about the factors contributing to TA; hence we conducted a qualitative study to understand the issues.
Methods
The participants were purposively selected, experienced HCWs (N=30) treating cancer patients from high-volume cancer centres nationwide. In-depth interviews (semi-structured, open-ended) were conducted by a person trained and experienced in qualitative interviews to understand the perspectives of HCWs on TA among adult cancer patients. We used the grounded theory approach to thematically analyze the data using inductive analysis.
Results
The HCWs (oncologists=17, nurses=6, psycho-oncologists=3, counselors=4) were selected from 9 states of India representing all geographical regions and working in both private (paid services, N= 14) and government (free services, N=16) sectors. The average duration of the interview was 30 minutes, and the reasons for TA perceived by the HCWs were classified under 6 themes: 1) Socio-demographic, 2) Patient-specific, 3) Clinical, 4) Psychological, 5) Health system related, and 6) Economic factors. Catastrophic health expenditure, direct medical and/or non-medical costs, indirect medical costs, poor socio-economic status, lack of specific knowledge about disease and treatment, poor patient-provider communication, accessibility, psychological distress, and toxicities of treatment were the common reasons for TA cited by the HCWs.
Conclusions
The study is one of the first studies reporting on HCWs’ perspective on TA among cancer patients in India. In addition to well-known socio-economic factors, this study identified important themes such as lacunae in communication and psychological issues (e.g., distress) causing TA. The results of this study will help plan quantitative research into the complex issues of TA and interventions to counter the problem.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
P. Ganesan.
Funding
Indian Council of Medical Research-ICMR, New Delhi, India.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1747P - The need for a better discussion between doctors and patients with regards to fertility preservation and vaginal rehab after anti cervical cancer treatments
Presenter: Bar Levy
Session: Poster session 23
1748P - Tackling childhood obesity epidemic on southern Europe through soft drink advertisement policies: Should oncology societies have a say?
Presenter: Konstantinos Kamposioras
Session: Poster session 23
1749P - Prevention of modifiable cancer risks in informal family caregivers of cancer patients: Implementation and evaluation of a personalised primary prevention intervention (PREV-AIDANT)
Presenter: Beatrice Fervers
Session: Poster session 23
1751P - Re-ranking cancer mortality using years of life lost
Presenter: Cecilia Radkiewicz
Session: Poster session 23
1752P - Clinical benefit of immunotherapies in advanced cancer in France: A population-based estimate from 2014 to 2021
Presenter: Isabelle Borget
Session: Poster session 23
1753P - Universal DPYD genotyping in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies: Real-world data from a single institution in Italy
Presenter: Claudia Cardone
Session: Poster session 23
1754P - Towards a next-generation sequencing/comprehensive genomic profiling value framework: Systematic review for identifying new domains and adapting a diagnostic test value framework in Europe
Presenter: Federico Augustovski
Session: Poster session 23
1755P - Carbohydrate quality index and incidence of obesity-related cancers: The Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra (SUN) project
Presenter: Maria Olmedo López-frías
Session: Poster session 23
1756P - Vizcan: A Swedish population-based study to address cancer outcomes using an interactive platform
Presenter: Anders Berglund
Session: Poster session 23