Abstract 1753P
Background
In up to 30% of gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies, fluoropyrimidines (FP) are associated with severe adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD), is a polymorphic gene involved in FP catabolism. The identification of deleterious variants associated with increased toxicity is recommended before treatment initiation [c.1905+1G>A (*2A); c.1679T>G (*13); c.1129-5923C>G (*IVS10); c.2846A>T (*949) or during treatment in case of ADR [c.2194G>A (*6)]. The estimated prevalence of DPYD deficient genotypes in the European population is <8%. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and implication of systematic DPYD testing in an unselected population with GI tumours.
Methods
The germline DPYD test was conducted on a consecutive series of 1000 pts diagnosed with GI malignancies at our Department between June 2020 and December 2022, candidates for FP for colorectal (CRC 69%), gastroesophageal (GEC 15%), biliopancreatic (BPC 12%), other GI tumours (4%) or double GI malignancy (<1%).
Results
Overall, 819 pts (82%) were DPYD wild type (WT) and 181 (18%) had a deleterious DPYD variant. Among DPYD mutated pts, 134 had CRC (74%), 23 GEC (13%), 17 BPC (9%), 5 other GI tumours (2%) and 1 had CRC and GEC (1%). 184 deleterious variants were observed in 181 pts, the most prevalent was DPYD *6 (N=146 15%) (Table). In 4 pts *6 coexisted with other variants, requiring dose personalization. Of 133 pts enrolled in interventional trials including FP treatment, 24 (18%) reported a deleterious variant: 2A N=1, IVS10 N=2, *6 N=21.
Table: 1753P
DPYD status | N= 1000 | % | FP dosea |
DPYD WT | 819 | 82% | 100% |
DPYD6_c2194G>A homozygosis heterozygosis | 146 * 5 141 | 15% | 70% 85% |
IVS10_1129_5923c>G | 20 | 2% | 50-70% |
DPYD2A_1905+1G>A | 12 | 1% | 50% |
DPYD949_c2846A>T | 5 | <1% | 50% |
DPYD13_c1679T>G | 2 | <1% | 50% |
a recommended dose based on SIF and CPIC guidelines *4 patients presented a double heterozygosis DPYD6 and *2A (N=1), FP dose <50% DPYD6 and c*949 (N=1), FP dose <50% DPYD6 and *IVS10 (N=2), FP dose 50%FP= fluoropyrimidines, WT=wild type
Conclusions
Our large cohort of GI pts revealed a higher prevalence of deleterious DPYD variants compared to previous reports. DPYD*6 was the most frequent genotype and, at a low rate, occurred with other variants requiring major dose adjustments. To prevent severe ADR and to adequately report toxicity and changes in pts' quality of life, our data suggest that DPYD assessment should be mandatory and included in all FP-based clinical trials.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
C. Cardone: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Advisory Board: Bayer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1890P - Switch-maintenance therapy with nivolumab in TKI-sensitive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Subgroup analysis for PD-L1 status of a randomized phase II study (NIVOSWITCH)
Presenter: Christopher Darr
Session: Poster session 23
1891P - Determinants of exceptional response to immune checkpoint inhibition in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Renee Saliby
Session: Poster session 23
1892P - A pooled meta-analysis of salvage nivolumab/ipilimumab (N+I) after nivolumab (N) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
Presenter: Rana McKay
Session: Poster session 23
1895P - Time to treatment failure (TTF) and treatment beyond progression (TBP) in pretreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients (pts) receiving nivolumab: A survival outcome and a therapeutic strategy of clinical benefit (meet-uro 15)
Presenter: Sara Elena Rebuzzi
Session: Poster session 23
1896P - Clinical management and outcomes of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) treated with nivolumab+ipilimumab (N+I): A real-world study
Presenter: Tom Geldart
Session: Poster session 23
1897P - Geographical differences in the management of metastatic de novo renal cell carcinoma in the era of immune-combinations
Presenter: Francesco Massari
Session: Poster session 23
1899P - Comparative effectiveness of second-line (2L) treatment (Rx) with cabozantinib (cabo) in patients (pts) with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) after first-line (1L) Rx with ipilimumab + nivolumab (ipi+nivo) vs. PD-1/L1 inhibitor (PDI) + tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)
Presenter: Georges Gebrael
Session: Poster session 23
1900P - Role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) in the era of immunotherapy (IO): An analysis of the national cancer database (2004-2020)
Presenter: ALINA BASNET
Session: Poster session 23