Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 03

422P - UK real-world data (RWD) of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) use in metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 03

Topics

Targeted Therapy

Tumour Site

Breast Cancer

Presenters

Georgina Gullick

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S334-S390. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)01260-7

Authors

G. Gullick1, C. Owen2, S. Cook3, J. Helbrow4, R. Squires1, H.M. Reed1, S. Park5, E. Weir5, F. Aquilina5, N. Webber6, E. Nye6, C. Atkinson3, C. Blair1, A. Halstead1, E. Daniels4, A. Alves1, S. Chew5, W. Thomas4, S. Spensley3, T. Robinson2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology Department, Bristol Cancer Institute, BS3 8ED - Bristol/GB
  • 2 Faculty Of Health Sciences, University of Bristol - Bristol Medical School, BS8 1UD - Bristol/GB
  • 3 Oncology Department, Musgrove Park Hospital - Taunton and Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, TA1 5DA - Taunton/GB
  • 4 Oncology Department, Gloucestershire Oncology Centre - Cheltenham General Hospital - Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, GL53 7AN - Cheltenham/GB
  • 5 Oncology Department, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital (Wonford) - NHS Royal Devon University Healthcare, EX2 5DW - Exeter/GB
  • 6 Oncology Department, Royal United Hospitals Bath - NHS Foundation trust, BA1 3NG - Bath/GB

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 422P

Background

Many studies support the use of CDK4/6i in MBC with aromatase inhibitors or fulvestrant. We assessed the efficacy and tolerability of CDK4/6i using RWD.

Methods

RWD was collected retrospectively from 5 UK centres. Patients with a diagnosis of ER+/HER2- MBC treated with a CDK4/6i between Apr 17 and Nov 22 were included. We used Kaplan-Meier statistical analysis to calculate follow-up time, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

665 patients were included (median age 66 (range 23-92)). 243 (36.5%) were documented as pre- and 343 (51.6%) as post-menopausal. 543 (81.7%) had 1st-line CDK4/6i and 122 (18.3%) had ≥ 2nd-line treatment. 536 (80.6%) received Palbociclib (P), 85 (12.8%) Abemaciclib (A) and 44 (6.6%) Ribociclib (R). The median follow-up time was 28 months (range 0-76; IQR 18-41). 1st-line PFS was P - 31 months (25-35), A - 16 months (9-NR) and R - 44 months (21-NR). ≥ 2nd-line PFS was P - 12 months (10-29), A - 15 months (11-30) and R - 15.5 months (10-NR). OS data is immature. Overall, 527 (79.2%) patients suffered any grade toxicity (P - 414 (77.2%), A - 72 (84.7%) and R - 41 (93.1%)) and 248 (37.2%) ≥Grade 3 (≥G3) (P - 203 (37.9%), A - 22 (25.9%) and R - 23 (52.3%)). The table outlines the most common toxicities by drug and grade. 366 (55%) patients had 1 dose reduction (DR): P - 290 (54.1%), A - 50 (58.8%) and R - 26 (59%). The median time to DR was 2 months (1-63), with no significant difference noticed between CDK4/6i. 113 (17%) patients had >1 DR: P - 96 (17.9%), A - 6 (13.6%) and R - 11 (12.9%). Table: 422P

P (n=536) A (n=85) R (n=44)
Toxicity Any grade (%) G3 (%) Any grade (%) G3 (%) Any grade (%) G3 (%)
Neutropenia 38.2 30.3 15.3 7.1 36.4 15.9
Fatigue 37.1 1.9 31.8 2.4 34.1 4.5
Diarrhoea 9.1 0.7 61.2 10.6 15.9 2.3
Mucositis 12.1 0.6 4.8 0 2.3 0
Hepatoxicity 2.8 1.3 1.2 1.2 27.3 20.5
Nausea 9.9 1.3 17.6 5.9 25.0 2.3
Rash 3.2 0 2.4 0 9.1 2.3

Conclusions

This large, RWD-set demonstrates PFS comparable to that of published trial data, but outcomes for A and R are impacted by small numbers and short follow up. ≥G3 toxicity was highest for P and R compared to A and lower than previously described, though DR rates were similar, suggesting significant side-effects were experienced. As their use increases and extends to the adjuvant setting, complete and mature RWD examining CDK4/6i toxicity, PFS and OS is required, especially for A and R.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

S. Spensley: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor, Meetings and Advisory Boards - reimbursed: Lilly, Roche, Pfizer. T. Robinson: Financial Interests, Personal, Sponsor/Funding: Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, MSD. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.