Abstract 2154P
Background
The role of lipid levels in the development and outcomes of cancer patients remains unclear in the literature. In this study, we aimed to analyze whether there is a relationship between total cholesterol levels and the survival of hospitalized cancer patients.
Methods
This retrospective observational study included patients admitted to the Medical Oncology Hospitalization Unit at La Paz University Hospital between September 2018 and January 2020. Total cholesterol levels, tumor type, treatment received, and mortality were analyzed.
Results
A total of 839 patients were included, with no differences in gender distribution. The most frequent tumor was lung (20.7%), followed by digestive tumors, including colorectal, esophagogastric, pancreatobiliary, or hepatic (33.4%), and breast (11.4%). The majority of patients were receiving active cancer-specific treatment, with chemotherapy (51.5%) or targeted treatments (18.6%) at the time of admission. At the end of the median follow-up period (31,8 months), 615 deaths had occurred (78.9%). The median overall survival (OS), regardless of tumor type, was 199 days. Having low total cholesterol values (less than 150 mg/dL) increased the risk of mortality by 25.9% compared to having physiological levels (150-200 mg/dL) (p=0.016, CI95% 1.045, 1.518)) with a Hazard Ratio of 1.259. Having high total cholesterol values (above 200 mg/dL) increased the risk of mortality by 30.6% compared to having physiological levels (p=0.036, CI95%(1.017, 1.677)) with an HR of 1.306.
Conclusions
To date, the majority of studies indicate that elevated cholesterol levels in patients with advanced cancer are associated with a higher risk of mortality, both due to a higher burden of comorbidity and the potential effects of cholesterol on oncogenic pathways. On the other hand, low cholesterol levels, possibly reflecting a significant metabolic dysregulation during cachexia, seem to be linked to a worse prognosis as well. Although the mechanisms by which high or low cholesterol levels increase the risk of mortality may differ, their incorporation into prognostic scores can contribute to a more accurate estimation of prognosis in advanced patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2162P - Can artificial intelligence provide accurate and reliable answers to cancer patients' questions? Comparison of chatbots based on the ESMO Patient Guide about cancer pain
Presenter: Kadriye Bir Yucel
Session: Poster session 07
2163P - Supportive care in French community pharmacies: OncoPharma certification
Presenter: Jérôme Sicard
Session: Poster session 07
2164P - The impact of cancer patients’ face masks on oxygenation and Co2 retention during treatment
Presenter: Mert Sahin
Session: Poster session 07
2165P - A French overview of electronic patient-reported outcomes use in 2022
Presenter: Melina Hocine
Session: Poster session 07
2166P - Long-term consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection in cancer patients
Presenter: Yana Debie
Session: Poster session 07
2167P - Are bone targeted agents (BTAs) still useful in times of immunotherapy? The SAKK 80/19 BTA study
Presenter: Michael Mark
Session: Poster session 07
2168P - At-home infusion of immunotherapy for patients with solid tumors: First results from a single-centre program
Presenter: Javier Marco Hernández
Session: Poster session 07
2169P - Immunotherapy-based treatment in elderly cancer patients: A real-world multicenter study
Presenter: Mengye He
Session: Poster session 07
2171P - Incidence of adverse events in patients treated with a combination of immune checkpoint blockers and chemotherapy: A real life cohort
Presenter: Layal Rached
Session: Poster session 07
2172P - Development and evaluation of the usefulness of an immune-related adverse events interview application
Presenter: AKIKO YANO
Session: Poster session 07